Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Statistical Ritual Versus Knowledge Accrual in Wildlife Science

Statistical Ritual Versus Knowledge Accrual in Wildlife Science Abstract: I hypothesized that statistical ritual has supplanted knowledge accrual as the sine qua non of wildlife science. Under the hypothesis, I deduced occurrence of 1) significance testing of the obvious and inconsequential, 2) quantitative debasement of research problems, and 3) publication of papers that largely lacked information but were methodologically impeccable. Articles in past and recent wildlife literature fit the deductions and supported the hypothesis. Thus, wildlife science is operating inefficiently because quantitative formalities are supplanting ecological information in technical articles. This problem can be corrected by a change of mindset in authors, referees, and editors. The change entails less emphasis on quantitative ritual and more emphasis on information that aids in understanding and explaining nature and managing wildlife. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of Wildlife Management Wiley

Statistical Ritual Versus Knowledge Accrual in Wildlife Science

The Journal of Wildlife Management , Volume 72 (8) – Nov 1, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/statistical-ritual-versus-knowledge-accrual-in-wildlife-science-CnHFdYP2bV

References (27)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company
ISSN
0022-541X
eISSN
1937-2817
DOI
10.2193/2008-179
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract: I hypothesized that statistical ritual has supplanted knowledge accrual as the sine qua non of wildlife science. Under the hypothesis, I deduced occurrence of 1) significance testing of the obvious and inconsequential, 2) quantitative debasement of research problems, and 3) publication of papers that largely lacked information but were methodologically impeccable. Articles in past and recent wildlife literature fit the deductions and supported the hypothesis. Thus, wildlife science is operating inefficiently because quantitative formalities are supplanting ecological information in technical articles. This problem can be corrected by a change of mindset in authors, referees, and editors. The change entails less emphasis on quantitative ritual and more emphasis on information that aids in understanding and explaining nature and managing wildlife.

Journal

The Journal of Wildlife ManagementWiley

Published: Nov 1, 2008

Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.