Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1976)
A matrix method for calculating recurrence risks of DE FINETTI , B . ( 1931 ) . Sul significeto della probabilith
(1969)
Biornathematica , vol . 2 . London : Griffin . unilocal disorders for genetic counselling . Annals of Human Genetica 40 , 25 - 36 . using phenotype information
(1975)
Extensions to pedigree analysis . I . Likelihood calculations for simple and
Ivar Heuch, F. Li (1972)
PEDIG ‐ A computer program for calculation of genotype probabilities using phenotype informationClinical Genetics, 3
B. Finetti (1931)
Sul significato soggettivo della probabilitàFundamenta Mathematicae, 17
(1931)
Sul significeto della probabilith
D. Bolling, G. Chase, E. Murphy (1976)
A matrix method for calculating recurrence risks of unilocal disorders for genetic counsellingAnnals of Human Genetics, 40
K. Lange, R. Elston (1975)
Extensions to Pedigree AnalysisHuman Heredity, 25
(1954)
The Foundations of Stati&cs
(1961)
London: Griffin. unilocal disorders for genetic counselling
Lange Lange, Elston Elston (1975)
Extensions to pedigree analysis. I. Likelihood calculations for simple and complex pedigreesHuman Heredity, 25
R. Elandt-Johnson (1972)
Probability models and statistical methods in genetics
J. Hilden (1970)
G E N EX ‐ An algebraic approach to pedigree probability calculusClinical Genetics, 1
Cedric Smith (1961)
Consistency in Statistical Inference and DecisionJournal of the royal statistical society series b-methodological, 23
(1969)
Biornathematica, vol
(1954)
PEDIG -A computer program for calculation of genotype probabilities HILDEN
BY CEDRIC A . B . SMITH Galton Laboratory, University College London, Cower Street, London, KC. 1 Bolling, Chase & Murphy (1976) have shown that the calculation of genetic probabilities for counselling can be put into a neat systematic form by the use of matrices. I n the following paper I attempt to spell their method out more explicitly and in detail. No great originality is claimed for this, since most of the ideas involved will be found either explicitly stated or implied in the paper by Bolling et al. But it may be useful to have the formulas in a more general form than they give, enabling them to be used with more complicated genetic systems. The mathematical formulation brings out more clearly the relations between probability and likelihood in statistical inference. An alternative method of calculating mendelian probabilities is provided by Hildenâs (1970) âGenstat â. This concentrates on expressing and manipulating probabilities in terms of generating functions. It provides a powerful approach, but suitable for dealing with joint distributions. I n the method of Bolling et al. as developed here, the purpose is rather to f k d the probabilities for a single individual in a
Annals of Human Genetics – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 1976
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.