/lp/sage/double-barreled-questions-an-analysis-of-the-similarity-of-elements-DnFmrTeuxT
References (47)
-
Jacob Cohen (1992)
QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN PSYCHOLOGY A Power Primer -
A. Graesser, Zhiqiang Cai, M. Louwerse, F. Daniel (2006)
Question Understanding Aid (QUAID) A Web Facility that Tests Question ComprehensibilityPublic Opinion Quarterly, 70
-
(2015)
Human Values Scale (ESS). -
Li-tze Hu, P. Bentler (1999)
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling, 6
-
N. Bradburn, S. Sudman, B. Wansink (2004)
Asking Questions: The Definitive Guide to Questionnaire Design -- For Market Research, Political Polls, and Social and Health Questionnaires -
J. Bassili, B. Scott (1996)
RESPONSE LATENCY AS A SIGNAL TO QUESTION PROBLEMS IN SURVEY RESEARCHPublic Opinion Quarterly, 60
-
S. Schwartz (2007)
Chapter 7 A Proposal for Measuring Value Orientations across Nations -
ESS Round 7 Source Questionnaire. London: ESS ERIC Headquarters, Centre for Comparative Social Surveys -
C. Beierlein, Frank Asbrock, Mathias Kauff, P. Schmidt (2014)
Die Kurzskala Autoritarismus (KSA-3): ein ökonomisches Messinstrument zur Erfassung dreier Subdimensionen autoritärer Einstellungen -
B. Muthén, T. Asparouhov (2014)
IRT studies of many groups: the alignment methodFrontiers in Psychology, 5
-
F. Fowler (1992)
How unclear terms affect survey data.Public opinion quarterly, 56 2
-
T. Raykov, Natalja Menold, G. Marcoulides (2018)
Studying Latent Criterion Validity for Complex Structure Measuring Instruments Using Latent Variable ModelingEducational and Psychological Measurement, 78
-
Sheldon Levy (2018)
Deconstructing a Double-Barreled Alternative: Evolution and CreationismPsychological Reports, 122
-
Natalja Menold, T. Raykov (2016)
Can Reliability of Multiple Component Measuring Instruments Depend on Response Option Presentation Mode?Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76
-
T. Raykov (2012)
Scale construction and development using structural equation modeling. -
S. Reise (2012)
The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement ModelsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 47
-
Angela Wetzel (2010)
Internet, mail, and mixed‐mode surveys: The tailored design methodJournal of Continuing Education in The Health Professions, 30
-
Jacquelyn Campbell, D. Webster, N. Glass (2009)
The Danger AssessmentJournal of Interpersonal Violence, 24
-
P. Chisnall (1993)
Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement, 35
-
(2017)
Mplus User’s Guide -
J. Hox, N. Borgers (2001)
Item Nonresponse in Questionnaire Research with ChildrenJournal of Official Statistics, 17
-
K. Yorkston, Carolyn Baylor, J. Dietz, B. Dudgeon, T. Eadie, Robert Miller, D. Amtmann (2008)
Developing a scale of communicative participation: A cognitive interviewing studyDisability and Rehabilitation, 30
-
(2015)
“ Balancierte Kurzskala autoritärer Einstellungen ( B - RWA - 6 ) . ” Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen ( ZIS ) -
S. Messick (1989)
Meaning and Values in Test Validation: The Science and Ethics of AssessmentEducational Researcher, 18
-
P. Vettehen, L. Snippenburg (2002)
Measuring Motivations for Media Exposure: A ThesisQuality & Quantity, 36
-
Karen Reisman (2008)
"The art of asking questions".Texas dental journal, 125 12
-
M. Larsen (2002)
The Psychology of Survey ResponseJournal of the American Statistical Association, 97
-
J. Krosnick (1991)
Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveysApplied Cognitive Psychology, 5
-
M. Kane (2013)
Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test ScoresJournal of Educational Measurement, 50
-
H. Bless, G. Bohner, N. Schwarz (1992)
Short Note Asking Difficult Questions: Task Complexity Increases the Impact of Response Alternatives -
J. Hox, Edith Leeuw, Eva Zijlmans (2015)
Measurement equivalence in mixed mode surveysFrontiers in Psychology, 6
-
P. Kay, C. Fillmore (1999)
Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? constructionLanguage, 75
-
(2017)
Krankheitswissen und Informationsbedarfe – Diabetes mellitus -
N. Schaeffer, Jennifer Dykema (2011)
Questions for Surveys: Current Trends and Future Directions.Public opinion quarterly, 75 5
-
M. Tatsuoka, F. Lord, M. Novick, A. Birnbaum (1971)
Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores.Journal of the American Statistical Association, 66
-
Double-Barreled Question -
B. Muthén (2002)
BEYOND SEM: GENERAL LATENT VARIABLE MODELINGBehaviormetrika, 29
-
Ting Yan, R. Tourangeau (2008)
Fast times and easy questions: the effects of age, experience and question complexity on web survey response timesApplied Cognitive Psychology, 22
-
K. Gemenis (2013)
Estimating parties’ policy positions through voting advice applications: Some methodological considerationsActa Politica, 48
-
W. Meredith (1993)
Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariancePsychometrika, 58
-
R. Williams, A. Heinemann, R. Bode, Catherine Wilson, J. Fann, D. Tate (2009)
Improving measurement properties of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 with rating scale analysis.Rehabilitation psychology, 54 2
-
A. Beauducel, W. Wittmann (2005)
Simulation Study on Fit Indexes in CFA Based on Data With Slightly Distorted Simple StructureStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 12
-
K. Petrides (2011)
Introduction to Psychometric Theory -
Timo Lenzner, Lars Kaczmirek, Alwine Lenzner (2010)
Cognitive burden of survey questions and response times: A psycholinguistic experimentApplied Cognitive Psychology, 24
-
F. Chen (2007)
Sensitivity of Goodness of Fit Indexes to Lack of Measurement InvarianceStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14
-
Laura Stafford (2011)
Measuring relationship maintenance behaviors: Critique and development of the revised relationship maintenance behavior scaleJournal of Social and Personal Relationships, 28
-
(2009)
Question and Questionnaire Design.
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © 2020 Natalja Menold, published by Sciendo
- ISSN
- 0282-423X
- eISSN
- 2001-7367
- DOI
- 10.2478/jos-2020-0041
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
In double barreled questions (DBQs) respondents provide one answer to two questions. Assumptions how respondents treat DBQs and how DBQs impact measurement quality are tested in two randomized experiments. DBQs are compared with revisions in which one stimulus was retained while the other stimulus was skipped. The observed means and parameters when modeling latent variables differed among the versions. Metric and scalar measurement invariance was not given among the versions, and at least one single stimulus version was found to be associated with a higher validity. Response latencies did not differ among versions or respondents needed less time to respond to DBQs. The author concludes that respondents may understand the stimuli in a DBQ differently, and access one of them while disregarding the other, which can have an adverse effect on validity.
Journal
Journal of Official Statistics – SAGE
Published: Dec 1, 2020
Keywords: Question wording; double barreled questions; validity; comparability; measurement invariance