Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Persson (2015)
Response to second letter-the-editor by LA Andersson: Contradictory data on type 1 diabetes in a recently published article ‘Risks of neurological and immune-related diseases, including narcolepsy, after vaccination with Pandemrix: a population- and registry-based cohort study with over 2 years of follow-up.J Intern Med, 277
L. Andersson (2015)
Retracted: Response on the author's reply to the Letter to the Editor: Contradictory data on type 1 diabetes in a recently published article ‘Risks of neurological and immune‐related diseases, including narcolepsy, after vaccination with Pandemrix’Journal of Internal Medicine, 277
L. Andersson (2014)
Retracted: Contradictory data on type 1 diabetes in a recently published article ‘Risks of neurological and immune‐related diseases, including narcolepsy, after vaccination with Pandemrix: a population‐ and registry‐based cohort study with over 2 years of follow‐up’ (J Intern Med 2013)Journal of Internal Medicine, 276
I. Persson (2014)
Response to Letter to the Editor by Lars AnderssonJournal of Internal Medicine, 276
Letter to the Editor doi: 10.1111/joim.12573 Dear Sir, to elaborate on the arguments presented in his present letter to the editor. We appreciate the possibility to comment on the new letter from Lars Andersson in this issue, Firstly, LA refers to national incidence rates pub- entitled ‘Hidden authority study data have come lished in the annual reports of SWEDIABKIDS and to light: besides narcolepsy the swine influenza claims that our study is missing about 60 (11%) vaccine Pandemrix caused type 1 diabetes’. cases of diabetes in the age groups 10–19. The Table 1 is an excerpt from LA’s letter. It should be noted that since our previous response to LA in JIM [1], LA has reported us to We investigated this issue in more detail. First, it the head of Karolinska Institutet (KI) for scientific should be noted that the age referred to in our misconduct, with accusations of manipulating the study is the persons’ age on 1 January 2009 and study protocol and the results to hide an that the study population is defined as persons increased risk of diabetes in adolescents, that is registered as residents in the study counties at the essentially based on the same
Journal of Internal Medicine – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.