Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1999)
The social contingency model: Identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions on the error-and-bias portrait of human nature.
Daniel Oppenheimer (2006)
Consequences of erudite vernacular utilized irrespective of necessity: problems with using long words needlesslyApplied Cognitive Psychology, 20
D. Kahneman, S. Frederick (2002)
Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
K. Boksman, J. Théberge, P. Williamson, D. Drost, A. Malla, M. Densmore, J. Takhar, W. Pavlosky, Ravi Menon, R. Neufeld (2005)
A 4.0-T fMRI study of brain connectivity during word fluency in first-episode schizophreniaSchizophrenia Research, 75
L. Rips (1994)
The Psychology of Proof: Deductive Reasoning in Human Thinking
L. Werth, F. Strack (2003)
An inferential approach to the knew-it-all-along phenomenonMemory, 11
H. Bless, N. Schwarz (1999)
Sufficient and necessary conditions in dual process models : The case of mood and information processing
D. Gilbert (1989)
Thinking lightly about others: Automatic components of the social inference process.
(1973)
On the psychology of prediction
B. Monin (2003)
The warm glow heuristic: when liking leads to familiarity.Journal of personality and social psychology, 85 6
D. Griffin, A. Tversky (2002)
Heuristics and Biases: The Weighing of Evidence and the Determinants of Confidence
N. Schwarz (2004)
Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision MakingJournal of Consumer Psychology, 14
N. Schwarz (1998)
Accessible Content and Accessibility Experiences: The Interplay of Declarative and Experiential Information in JudgmentPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2
Jonathan Evans, D. Over (1996)
Rationality and reasoning
Jonathan Evans (2003)
In two minds: dual-process accounts of reasoningTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 7
R. Reber, P. Winkielman, N. Schwarz (1998)
Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective JudgmentsPsychological Science, 9
M. McGlone, Jessica Tofighbakhsh (2000)
Birds of a Feather Flock Conjointly (?): Rhyme as Reason in AphorismsPsychological Science, 11
A. Kruglanski, E. Thompson (1999)
Persuasion by a Single Route: A View From the UnimodelPsychological Inquiry, 10
N. Schwarz, H. Bless, G. Bohner (1991)
Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive CommunicationsAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 24
G. Bodenhausen, C. Macrae, J. Sherman (1999)
On the dialectics of discrimination: Dual processes in social stereotyping
V. Goel, C. Buchel, C. Frith, R. Dolan (2000)
Dissociation of Mechanisms Underlying Syllogistic ReasoningNeuroImage, 12
Matthew Lieberman, R. Gaunt, D. Gilbert, Y. Trope (2002)
Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inferenceAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34
B. Whittlesea, Jason Leboe (2003)
Two fluency heuristics (and how to tell them apart)Journal of Memory and Language, 49
T. Jones, Larry Jacoby (2001)
Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory.Journal of Memory and Language, 45
FLUENCY AND PROCESSING DEPTH
I. Ajzen, James Sexton (1999)
Depth of processing, belief congruence, and attitude-behavior correspondence.
M. Osman (2004)
An evaluation of dual-process theories of reasoningPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11
R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1986)
The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion
M. Botvinick, T. Braver, D. Barch, C. Carter, J. Cohen (2001)
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control.Psychological review, 108 3
L. Jacoby, Colleen Kelley, Brian McElree (1999)
The role of cognitive control: Early selection versus late correction.
M. Gill, W. Swann, D. Silvera (1998)
On the genesis of confidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75
Adam Alter, Daniel Oppenheimer (2006)
Predicting short-term stock fluctuations by using processing fluency.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 24
B. Keysar, D. Barr (2002)
Self-anchoring in conversation: Why language users do not do what they 'should'
R. Guttentag, Jennifer Dunn (2003)
Judgments of remembering: the revelation effect in children and adults.Journal of experimental child psychology, 86 2
G. Boolos (1984)
On ‘syllogistic inference’Cognition, 17
J. Forgas (1995)
Mood and judgment: the affect infusion model (AIM).Psychological bulletin, 117 1
S. Chaiken, Y. Trope (1999)
Dual-process theories in social psychology
(1998)
The Karolinska directed emotional faces. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institute, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology Section
(2006)
First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-ms exposure to a face
Sabine Stepper, F. Strack (1993)
Proprioceptive Determinants of Emotional and Nonemotional FeelingsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64
R. Tourangeau, P. Ellsworth (1979)
The role of facial response in the experience of emotion.Journal of personality and social psychology, 37 9
D. Spalding
The Principles of PsychologyNature, 7
Thomas Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (2002)
Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment
K. Stanovich, R. West, D. Funder (2000)
Individual differences in reasoning: Implications for the rationality debate?-Open Peer Commentary-Gone with the wind: Individual differences in heuristics and biases undermine the implication of
S. Sloman (1996)
The empirical case for two systems of reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 119
J. Simmons, Leif Nelson (2006)
Intuitive confidence: choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 135 3
S. Chaiken (1980)
Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39
Nicholas Epley, B. Keysar, Leaf Boven, Thomas Gilovich (2004)
Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment.Journal of personality and social psychology, 87 3
Colleen Kelley, D. Lindsay (1993)
Remembering Mistaken for Knowing: Ease of Retrieval as a Basis for Confidence in Answers to General Knowledge QuestionsJournal of Memory and Language, 32
Humans appear to reason using two processing styles: System 1 processes that are quick, intuitive, and effortless and System 2 processes that are slow, analytical, and deliberate that occasionally correct the output of System 1. Four experiments suggest that System 2 processes are activated by metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency during the process of reasoning. Incidental experiences of difficulty or disfluency—receiving information in a degraded font (Experiments 1 and 4), in difficult-to-read lettering (Experiment 2), or while furrowing one's brow (Experiment 3)—reduced the impact of heuristics and defaults in judgment (Experiments 1 and 3), reduced reliance on peripheral cues in persuasion (Experiment 2), and improved syllogistic reasoning (Experiment 4). Metacognitive experiences of difficulty or disfluency appear to serve as an alarm that activates analytic forms of reasoning that assess and sometimes correct the output of more intuitive forms of reasoning.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General – American Psychological Association
Published: Nov 1, 2007
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.