Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Esophagectomy Using a Thoracoscopic Approach With an Open Laparotomic or Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Abdominal Stage for Esophageal Cancer Analysis of Survival and Prognostic Factors in 315 Patients

Esophagectomy Using a Thoracoscopic Approach With an Open Laparotomic or Hand-Assisted... ORIGINAL ARTICLE Esophagectomy Using a Thoracoscopic Approach With an Open Laparotomic or Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Abdominal Stage for Esophageal Cancer Analysis of Survival and Prognostic Factors in 315 Patients ∗ ∗ ∗ Hirofumi Ichikawa, MD, PhD, Go Miyata, MD, PhD, Shukichi Miyazaki, MD, PhD,† Ko Onodera, MD, PhD, ∗ ∗ Takashi Kamei, MD, PhD, Tohru Hoshida, MD, PhD,‡ Hiroshi Kikuchi, MD, PhD, Rikiya Kanba, MD, PhD,§ ∗ ∗ Toru Nakano, MD, PhD, Takashi Akaishi, MD, PhD,|| and Susumu Satomi, MD, PhD techniques since the first report of esophagectomy with a right tho- Objective: To estimate the oncological feasibility of thoracoscopic-assisted racoscopic approach in 1992. Various endoscopic techniques for esophagectomy (TAE) for esophageal cancer and to clarify the prognostic esophagectomy have been demonstrated, most using a thoracoscopic impact of perioperative factors after TAE. approach, together with an open laparotomic or laparoscopic ab- Background: Favorable perioperative outcomes of TAE versus open surgery dominal stage (thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy, TAE). Favor- have been demonstrated. However, survival data after TAE in a large cohort able perioperative outcomes for TAE have been demonstrated in are limited, and no information on the prognostic influence of perioperative 4–10 comparative studies between TAE and open surgery, and on- factors after http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Annals of Surgery Wolters Kluwer Health

Esophagectomy Using a Thoracoscopic Approach With an Open Laparotomic or Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Abdominal Stage for Esophageal Cancer Analysis of Survival and Prognostic Factors in 315 Patients

Annals of Surgery , Volume 257 (5) – May 1, 2013

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wolters-kluwer-health/esophagectomy-using-a-thoracoscopic-approach-with-an-open-laparotomic-FhgHruyoH3

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Copyright
© 2013 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
ISSN
0003-4932
eISSN
1528-1140
DOI
10.1097/SLA.0b013e31826c87cd
pmid
23001081
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Esophagectomy Using a Thoracoscopic Approach With an Open Laparotomic or Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Abdominal Stage for Esophageal Cancer Analysis of Survival and Prognostic Factors in 315 Patients ∗ ∗ ∗ Hirofumi Ichikawa, MD, PhD, Go Miyata, MD, PhD, Shukichi Miyazaki, MD, PhD,† Ko Onodera, MD, PhD, ∗ ∗ Takashi Kamei, MD, PhD, Tohru Hoshida, MD, PhD,‡ Hiroshi Kikuchi, MD, PhD, Rikiya Kanba, MD, PhD,§ ∗ ∗ Toru Nakano, MD, PhD, Takashi Akaishi, MD, PhD,|| and Susumu Satomi, MD, PhD techniques since the first report of esophagectomy with a right tho- Objective: To estimate the oncological feasibility of thoracoscopic-assisted racoscopic approach in 1992. Various endoscopic techniques for esophagectomy (TAE) for esophageal cancer and to clarify the prognostic esophagectomy have been demonstrated, most using a thoracoscopic impact of perioperative factors after TAE. approach, together with an open laparotomic or laparoscopic ab- Background: Favorable perioperative outcomes of TAE versus open surgery dominal stage (thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy, TAE). Favor- have been demonstrated. However, survival data after TAE in a large cohort able perioperative outcomes for TAE have been demonstrated in are limited, and no information on the prognostic influence of perioperative 4–10 comparative studies between TAE and open surgery, and on- factors after

Journal

Annals of SurgeryWolters Kluwer Health

Published: May 1, 2013

There are no references for this article.