Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/informs/technology-regimes-and-new-firm-formation-FqDqieBbeL
References (54)
-
J. Bound, Clint Cummins, Z. Griliches, Bronwyn Hall, A. Jaffe (1982)
Who Does R&D and Who Patents?IO: Productivity
-
R. Cyert, J. March (1964)
A Behavioral Theory of the Firm -
J. Schumpeter (1943)
Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy -
Z. Acs, D. Audretsch (1990)
The Economics of Small Firms -
(1998)
AMERICAN CAPITALISMCreating Modern Capitalism
-
J. Lerner (1994)
The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical AnalysisThe RAND Journal of Economics, 25
-
J. Utterback, W. Abernathy (1975)
A dynamic model of process and product innovationOmega-international Journal of Management Science, 3
-
E. Roberts (1991)
Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond -
A. Klevorick, R. Levin, R. Nelson, S. Winter (1995)
On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological OpportunitiesResearch Policy, 24
-
Raimar Richers (1961)
The theory of economic developmentRae-revista De Administracao De Empresas, 1
-
S. Venkataraman (1997)
The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor''s perspective -
Wesley Cohen, R. Levin (1989)
Empirical studies of innovation and market structureHandbook of Industrial Organization, 2
-
I. Feller, Z. Griliches (1981)
R&D, Patents, and ProductivityTechnology and Culture, 28
-
R. Caves (1998)
Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of FirmsJournal of Economic Literature, 36
-
Wesley Cohen, Daniel Levinthal (1990)
ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATIONAdministrative Science Quarterly, 35
-
G. Dosi (1982)
Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories: A Suggested Interpretation of the Determinants and Directions of Technical ChangeResearch Policy, 11
-
Contracting and competition: The two faces of appropriability, Working paper -
D. Teece (1993)
Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policyResearch Policy, 15
-
(2000)
This paper was with the authors 3 months for 1 revision -
C. Phillips (1971)
Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance -
Jacques Crémer, Marvin Sirbu (1978)
Une analyse économétrique de l'effort de recherche et développement de l'industrie françaiseRevue économique, 29
-
D. Audretsch (1995)
Innovation and Industry Evolution -
R. Beaty (1993)
The competitive challengeManufacturing Engineer, 72
-
W. Dugger (1987)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismJournal of Economic Issues, 21
-
California Management Rev -
Clayton Christensen, J. Bower (1996)
CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMSStrategic Management Journal, 17
-
Jerome Katz (1998)
Advances in Entrepreneurship, Firm Emergence and Growth -
S. Winter (1983)
Schumpeterian Competition in Alternative Technological RegimesJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 5
-
J. Bus. Venturing -
Richard Highfield, R. Smiley (1987)
New business starts and economic activity: An empirical investigationInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 5
-
F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo (1997)
Technological Regimes and Sectoral Patterns of Innovative ActivitiesIndustrial and Corporate Change, 6
-
R. Levin, A. Klevorick, R. Nelson, S. Winter (1987)
Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, 18
-
I. Cockburn, Z. Griliches (1987)
Industry Effects and Appropriability Measures in the Stock Markets Valuation of R&D and PatentsInnovation Finance & Accounting eJournal
-
Michael Gort, S. Klepper (1982)
Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product InnovationsThe Economic Journal, 92
-
R. Levin, Wesley Cohen, D. Mowery (1985)
R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian HypothesesThe American Economic Review, 75
-
K. Arrow (1962)
Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention -
F. Malerba, L. Orsenigo (1996)
Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specificResearch Policy, 25
-
(1997)
Managing the university technology licensing process: Findings from case studies -
Gavin Wright (1982)
An evolutionary theory of economic changeTechnology in Society, 4
-
J. Utterback, L. Kim (1985)
Invasion of a Stable Business by Radical Innovation -
P. Geroski (1995)
What do we know about entryInternational Journal of Industrial Organization, 13
-
W. Gartner, S. Shane (1995)
Measuring entrepreneurship over timeJournal of Business Venturing, 10
-
R. Henderson, A. Jaffe, M. Trajtenberg (1995)
Universities as a Source of Commercial Technology: A Detailed Analysis of University Patenting, 19651988Review of Economics and Statistics, 80
-
R. Nelson (1959)
The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific ResearchJournal of Political Economy, 67
-
E. Hippel (1982)
Appropriability of innovation benefit as a predictor of the source of innovationResearch Policy, 11
-
D. Teece (1998)
Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible AssetsCalifornia Management Review, 40
-
D. Teece (1992)
Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological ProgressJournal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18
-
Z. Acs, D. Audretsch (1990)
Innovation and Small Firms -
G. Loury (1979)
Market Structure and InnovationQuarterly Journal of Economics, 93
-
D. Orr (1974)
The Determinants of Entry: A Sudy of the Canadian Manufacturing IndustriesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 56
-
G. Dosi (1988)
Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of InnovationJournal of Economic Literature, 26
-
Paolo Leon (1986)
The Economic Institutions of CapitalismThe Antitrust Bulletin, 31
-
P. Natarajan (1973)
The Conditions for Success in Technological InnovationThe Indian journal of nutrition and dietetics, 10
-
D. Massing (1996)
AUTM Licensing Survey
- Publisher
- INFORMS
- Copyright
- Copyright © INFORMS
- Subject
- Research Article
- ISSN
- 0025-1909
- eISSN
- 1526-5501
- DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.47.9.1173.9785
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
At least since Schumpeter (1934 and 1942), researchers have been interested in identifying the dimensions of technology regimes that facilitate new firm formation as a mode of technology exploitation. Using data on 1,397 patents assigned to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology during the 1980-1996 period, I show that four hypothesized dimensions of the technology regime—the age of the technical field, the tendency of the market toward segmentation, the effectiveness of patents, and the importance of complementary assets in marketing and distribution—influence the likelihood that new technology will be exploited through firm formation.
Journal
Management Science – INFORMS
Published: Sep 1, 2001
Keywords: Keywords : Entrepreneurship ; Technology Regimes ; Patents