Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Jianli Chen, C. Wilson, B. Tapley, J. Ries (2004)
Low degree gravitational changes from GRACE: Validation and interpretationGeophysical Research Letters, 31
M. Rodell, P. Houser, U. Jambor, J. Gottschalck, K. Mitchell, C. Meng, K. Arsenault, B. Cosgrove, J. Radakovich, M. Bosilovich, J. Entin, J. Walker, D. Lohmann, D. Toll (2004)
THE GLOBAL LAND DATA ASSIMILATION SYSTEMBulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 85
B. Tapley, S. Bettadpur, J. Ries, P. Thompson, M. Watkins (2004)
GRACE Measurements of Mass Variability in the Earth SystemScience, 305
R. Schmidt, P. Schwintzer, F. Flechtner, C. Reigber, A. Güntner, P. Döll, G. Ramillien, A. Cazenave, S. Petrovic, H. Jochmann, J. Wünsch (2006)
GRACE observations of changes in continental water storageGlobal and Planetary Change, 50
S. Swenson, J. Wahr (2002)
Methods for inferring regional surface‐mass anomalies from Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) measurements of time‐variable gravityJournal of Geophysical Research, 107
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, MS 183-501, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive
J. Wahr, S. Swenson, V. Zlotnicki, I. Velicogna (2004)
Time‐variable gravity from GRACE: First resultsGeophysical Research Letters, 31
J. Wahr, Mery Molenaar, F. Bryan (1998)
Time variability of the Earth's gravity field: Hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACEJournal of Geophysical Research, 103
K. Seo, C. Wilson (2005)
Estimating GRACE Aliasing Errors, 129
Shin‐Chan Han, C. Shum, C. Jekeli, C. Kuo, C. Wilson, K. Seo (2005)
Non-isotropic filtering of GRACE temporal gravity for geophysical signal enhancementGeophysical Journal International, 163
D. Chambers, J. Wahr, R. Nerem (2004)
Preliminary observations of global ocean mass variations with GRACEGeophysical Research Letters, 31
Steve Graham, J. Famiglietti, D. Maidment (1999)
Five‐minute, 1/2°, and 1° data sets of continental watersheds and river networks for use in regional and global hydrologic and climate system modeling studiesWater Resources Research, 35
K. Seo, C. Wilson (2005)
Simulated estimation of hydrological loads from GRACEJournal of Geodesy, 78
G. Ramillien, F. Frappart, A. Cazenave, A. Güntner (2005)
Time variations of land water storage from an inversion of 2 years of GRACE geoidsEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 235
M. Rodell, J. Famiglietti, Jianli Chen, S. Seneviratne, P. Viterbo, S. Holl, C. Wilson (2004)
Basin scale estimates of evapotranspiration using GRACE and other observationsGeophysical Research Letters, 31
S. Swenson, J. Wahr, P. Milly (2003)
Estimated accuracies of regional water storage variations inferred from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE)Water Resources Research, 39
Kalnay Kalnay (1996)
The NCEP/NCAR 40‐year reanalysis projectBull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83
M. Kanamitsu, W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen, Shi-Keng Yang, J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, G. Potter (2002)
NCEP–DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2)Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83
I. Fukumori, T. Lee, D. Menemnlis, L. Fu, B. Cheng, B. Tang, Z. Xing, R. Giering (2000)
A dual assimilation system for satellite altimetry
Graham Graham, Famiglietti Famiglietti, Maidment Maidment (1999)
5‐minute, 1/2‐degree, and 1‐degree data sets of continental watersheds and river networks for use in regional and global hydrologic and climate system modeling studiesWater Resour. Res., 35
Recent studies show that data from the Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE) is promising for basin‐ to global‐scale water cycle research. This study provides varied assessments of errors associated with GRACE water storage estimates. Thirteen monthly GRACE gravity solutions from August 2002 to December 2004 are examined, along with synthesized GRACE gravity fields for the same period that incorporate simulated errors. The synthetic GRACE fields are calculated using numerical climate models and GRACE internal error estimates. We consider the influence of measurement noise, spatial leakage error, and atmospheric and ocean dealiasing (AOD) model error as the major contributors to the error budget. Leakage error arises from the limited range of GRACE spherical harmonics not corrupted by noise. AOD model error is due to imperfect correction for atmosphere and ocean mass redistribution applied during GRACE processing. Four methods of forming water storage estimates from GRACE spherical harmonics (four different basin filters) are applied to both GRACE and synthetic data. Two basin filters use Gaussian smoothing, and the other two are dynamic basin filters which use knowledge of geographical locations where water storage variations are expected. Global maps of measurement noise, leakage error, and AOD model errors are estimated for each basin filter. Dynamic basin filters yield the smallest errors and highest signal‐to‐noise ratio. Within 12 selected basins, GRACE and synthetic data show similar amplitudes of water storage change. Using 53 river basins, covering most of Earth's land surface excluding Antarctica and Greenland, we document how error changes with basin size, latitude, and shape. Leakage error is most affected by basin size and latitude, and AOD model error is most dependent on basin latitude.
Water Resources Research – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.