Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Relative nuclear DNA content and nuclear area were determined in fast growing, karyotypically normal, fibroblastic cell cultures derived from five human females. In two cultures H<sup>3</sup> thymidine autoradiographic and photometric determinations were combined on the same nuclei. This allowed the separation of nuclei into three groups: those with the lowest mean DNA values which did not take up H<sup>3</sup> thymidine are in the G<sub>1</sub> period (2d group); those with intermediate DNA values which did take up thymidine are presumably synthesizing DNA and are in the S period; those which have double the mean 2d group DNA value and did not take up thymidine are a mixture of nuclei in the G<sub>2</sub> period with some true tetraploids 4d group). The overall frequency of sex chromatin positive nuclei in the cultures studied ranges from 64 to 78%. Sex chromatin positive nuclei occur with about the same frequency in 2d and S nuclei but are somewhat more frequent in 4d nuclei. In three cultures the relative DNA content of sex chromatin was determined. Sex chromatin of 4d nuclei contain about twice as much DNA as those of 2d nuclei; the DNA content of sex chromatin of S nuclei is between that of 2d and 4a nuclei but closer to the mean 2d value. Sex chromatin can be identified in labelled S nuclei. These observations clearly indicate that the condensed, sex chromatin forming X chromosome does not despiralize completely during DNA replication as some authors have suggested. The DNA content of sex chromatin positive and negative nuclei is identical within each nuclear group. The areas of sex chromatin positive 2d group nuclei are larger than for negative nuclei, but this difference is only significant in one of the cultures where a large number of nuclei were measured. It is concluded that failure of the X chromosome to condense in some nuclei of females is not related to DNA
Cytogenetic and Genome Research – Karger
Published: Jan 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.