Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Purposive Psychology and the Conditioned Reflex

Purposive Psychology and the Conditioned Reflex Discusses the conditioned reflex and the mechanistic point of view in psychology. The author of this article is responding to criticism of the conditioned reflex and feels that the criticisms are unfounded. He makes the point that no one has made the claim that anatomical features and reflex tendencies can be inherited. The author also feels that the position of some behaviorists in this regard should not be denounced on moral grounds. It is very well to insist on anthropomorphic and purposive interpretations, if one chooses to do so, but the author sees no justification for supposing that either mechanistic philosophy or behavioristic psychology depend upon conditioned reflexes; this is probably more than the conditioned reflexes could bear. A more desirable method of criticizing conditioned reflexes would be to consider the experimental evidence itself, and attempt to point out the fallacies therein. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Review American Psychological Association

Purposive Psychology and the Conditioned Reflex

Psychological Review , Volume 31 (3): 3 – May 1, 1924

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/purposive-psychology-and-the-conditioned-reflex-IL9Tvyekxr

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright ©
ISSN
0033-295x
eISSN
1939-1471
DOI
10.1037/h0064206
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Discusses the conditioned reflex and the mechanistic point of view in psychology. The author of this article is responding to criticism of the conditioned reflex and feels that the criticisms are unfounded. He makes the point that no one has made the claim that anatomical features and reflex tendencies can be inherited. The author also feels that the position of some behaviorists in this regard should not be denounced on moral grounds. It is very well to insist on anthropomorphic and purposive interpretations, if one chooses to do so, but the author sees no justification for supposing that either mechanistic philosophy or behavioristic psychology depend upon conditioned reflexes; this is probably more than the conditioned reflexes could bear. A more desirable method of criticizing conditioned reflexes would be to consider the experimental evidence itself, and attempt to point out the fallacies therein.

Journal

Psychological ReviewAmerican Psychological Association

Published: May 1, 1924

There are no references for this article.