Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Discusses the conditioned reflex and the mechanistic point of view in psychology. The author of this article is responding to criticism of the conditioned reflex and feels that the criticisms are unfounded. He makes the point that no one has made the claim that anatomical features and reflex tendencies can be inherited. The author also feels that the position of some behaviorists in this regard should not be denounced on moral grounds. It is very well to insist on anthropomorphic and purposive interpretations, if one chooses to do so, but the author sees no justification for supposing that either mechanistic philosophy or behavioristic psychology depend upon conditioned reflexes; this is probably more than the conditioned reflexes could bear. A more desirable method of criticizing conditioned reflexes would be to consider the experimental evidence itself, and attempt to point out the fallacies therein.
Psychological Review – American Psychological Association
Published: May 1, 1924
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.