Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy expenditure estimated with DLW

Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy... European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2016) 70, 1259–1264 © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved 0954-3007/16 www.nature.com/ejcn ORIGINAL ARTICLE Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy expenditure estimated with DLW 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 1 TS Lopes , RR Luiz , DJ Hoffman , E Ferriolli , K Pfrimer , AS Moura , R Sichieri and RA Pereira BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of dietary assessment methods has rarely been validated using precise techniques. The objective of this work was to evaluate the validity of energy intake (EI) estimated with food records (FRs) and 24-h recalls (24hRs) against total energy expenditure (EE) estimated by the doubly labeled water (DLW) method. In addition, the magnitude of EI under-reporting was assessed along with its associated characteristics. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The studied group included 83 adults between 20 and 60 years of age who were recruited from a population-based sample. Within-person variation-adjusted means of EI estimated from two FRs and three 24hRs were compared with EE estimated using the DLW method multiple-point protocol. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the differences between EI and EE, whereas Bland–Altman and http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Clinical Nutrition Springer Journals

Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy expenditure estimated with DLW

Download PDF
6 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/springer-journals/misreport-of-energy-intake-assessed-with-food-records-and-24-h-recalls-ILWcV2Qn0K

References (56)

Publisher
Springer Journals
Copyright
Copyright
Subject
Medicine & Public Health; Medicine/Public Health, general; Public Health; Epidemiology; Internal Medicine; Clinical Nutrition; Metabolic Diseases
ISSN
0954-3007
eISSN
1476-5640
DOI
10.1038/ejcn.2016.85
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2016) 70, 1259–1264 © 2016 Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature. All rights reserved 0954-3007/16 www.nature.com/ejcn ORIGINAL ARTICLE Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy expenditure estimated with DLW 1 2 3 4 4 5 6 1 TS Lopes , RR Luiz , DJ Hoffman , E Ferriolli , K Pfrimer , AS Moura , R Sichieri and RA Pereira BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of dietary assessment methods has rarely been validated using precise techniques. The objective of this work was to evaluate the validity of energy intake (EI) estimated with food records (FRs) and 24-h recalls (24hRs) against total energy expenditure (EE) estimated by the doubly labeled water (DLW) method. In addition, the magnitude of EI under-reporting was assessed along with its associated characteristics. SUBJECTS/METHODS: The studied group included 83 adults between 20 and 60 years of age who were recruited from a population-based sample. Within-person variation-adjusted means of EI estimated from two FRs and three 24hRs were compared with EE estimated using the DLW method multiple-point protocol. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess the differences between EI and EE, whereas Bland–Altman and

Journal

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition – Springer Journals

Published: Jun 8, 2016

There are no references for this article.