Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
J. Mills (1967)
Comment on Bem's "self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena".Psychological review, 74 6
K. O'Leary, R. Drabman, Ruth Kass (1973)
Maintenance of appropriate behavior in a token programJournal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1
J. Holt (1964)
How Children Fail
H. Scheffé (1960)
The Analysis of Variance
P. Jackson (1968)
Life in Classrooms
E. Langer, R. Abelson (1972)
The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24
D. Bem (1967)
Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena.Psychological review, 74 3
D. Kipnis (1972)
Does power corrupt?Journal of personality and social psychology, 24 1
A. Kruglanski (1970)
Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relationsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6
L. Strickland (1958)
Surveillance and trust.Journal of personality, 26 2
L. Strickland (1958)
Surveillance and trust1Journal of Personality, 26
M. Lepper, D. Greene, R. Nisbett (1973)
Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the "overjustification" hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28
H. Kelley (1973)
The processes of causal attribution.American Psychologist, 28
H. Kelley (1967)
Attribution theory in social psychology, 15
D. Greene, M. Lepper (1974)
Effects of extrinsic rewards on children's subsequent intrinsic interest.Child development, 45 4
S. Duval, R. Wicklund (1972)
A theory of objective self awareness
D. Bem (1972)
Self-Perception TheoryAdvances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6
C. Silberman (1970)
Crisis in the Classroom
80 preschool 4-5 yr olds participated in a novel activity in individual sessions. In the expected reward conditions, Ss expected to win a chance to play with highly attractive toys by engaging in the activity; in the unexpected reward conditions, Ss had no prior knowledge of this reward. Orthogonally, Ss in the surveillance conditions were told that their performance would be monitored via a TV camera; Ss in the nonsurveillance conditions were not monitored. 2 wks later, unobtrusive measures of the Ss' intrinsic interest in the activity were obtained in their classrooms. 2 significant main effects were obtained reproducing and expanding findings from earlier studies. Ss who had undertaken the activity expecting an extrinsic reward showed less subsequent interest in the activity than those who had not expected a reward, and Ss who had been placed under surveillance showed less subsequent interest than those not previously monitored. (19 ref)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology – American Psychological Association
Published: Mar 1, 1975
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.