Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Alker, Victoria Joy, P. Roberts, Nathan Smith (2000)
The Definition of BrownfieldJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 43
J. Hamilton, W. Viscusi (1999)
How costly is “clean”? An analysis of the benefits and costs of Superfund site remediationsJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 18
P. Wattage, Andrew Smith, C. Pitts, A. McDonald, D. Kay (2000)
Integrating environmental impact, contingent valuation and cost-benefit analysis: empirical evidence for an alternative perspectiveImpact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 18
Shreekant Gupta, G. Houtven, M. Cropper (1996)
Paying for Permanence: An Economic Analysis of EPA's Cleanup Decisions at Superfund SitesThe RAND Journal of Economics, 27
R. Cassen (1987)
Our common future: report of the World Commission on Environment and DevelopmentInternational Affairs, 64
David Brazell, Geraldine Gerardi (1994)
ISSUES IN FINANCING THE SUPERFUNDNational Tax Journal, 47
Mitchell Mitchell, May May, McDonald McDonald (1995)
PICABUE, a methodological framework for the development of indicators of sustainable developmentInternational Journal of Sustainable Development, 2
Recent UK Government strategies and planning policies have embraced the principle of sustainable development, presenting this as a framework for future planning and land‐use decisions. This paper will review those policies that emphasize the need to re‐use previously developed land. Resulting from these policies is a need for local authorities, in particular, to adopt a sequential testing approach in terms of land‐use decisions. We evaluated the sequential testing approaches advocated, examining how they equate with the assessment of indicators of sustainable development. Current sequential testing approaches tend to evaluate over‐arching considerations within the planning framework and do not necessarily assess site‐specific characteristics. This paper argues that if optimum adherence to the principle of sustainable development in land‐use decisions is desired, the pre‐determination of end‐use should be ended or at least minimized since it does not facilitate sustainable development. It is suggested that in order to achieve sustainable development in land‐use decisions, a sequential approach to determine end‐use, based on those characteristics exhibited by the site is necessary. Therefore, there is also a need for a mechanism that can assess whether the development decision has reached an optimum choice concerning sustainable development. The paper concludes by proposing that a framework for expressing site characteristics as elements of sustainable development is needed to enable best possible sustainable land‐use decisions. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.
Sustainable Development – Wiley
Published: Aug 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.