Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Britschgi, U. Steiner, S. Schmid, J. Depta, G. Senti, A. Bircher, C. Burkhart, N. Yawalkar, W. Pichler (2001)
T-cell involvement in drug-induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.The Journal of clinical investigation, 107 11
E. Smart (1986)
Mercury vapour levels in a domestic environment following breakage of a clinical thermometer.The Science of the total environment, 57
P. Wolkenstein, O. Chosidow, M. Fléchet, O. Robbiola, M. Paul, L. Dumé, Jean Renuz, J. Roujeau (1996)
Patch testing in severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions, including Stevens‐Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysisContact Dermatitis, 35
T. Demitsu, A. Kosuge, Tomoko Yamada, K. Usui, Hiroshi Katayama, Hideo Yaoita (1996)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by dexamethasone injection.Dermatology, 193 1
M. Lerch, A. Bircher (2004)
Systemically induced allergic exanthem from mercuryContact Dermatitis, 50
A. Sidoroff, S. Halevy, J. Bavinck, L. Vaillant, J. Roujeau (2001)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) – A clinical reaction patternJournal of Cutaneous Pathology, 28
J. Mayenburg, J. Rakoski, C. Szliska (1991)
Patch testing with amalgam at various concentrationsContact Dermatitis, 24
(1983)
Mercury exanthema
J. Roujeau, P. Bioulac-Sage, Catherine Bourseau, J. Guillaume, P. Bernard, C. Lok, P. Plantin, A. Claudy, C. Delavierre, L. Vaillant, J. Wechsler, G. Danan, C. Bénichou, C. Beylot (1991)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis. Analysis of 63 cases.Archives of dermatology, 127 9
(1996)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by dexamethasone
(2004)
Systematically induced allergic exanthem frommercury
V. Jan, L. Machet, N. Gironet, L. Martín, M. Machet, G. Lorette, L. Vaillant (1998)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis induced by diltiazem: value of patch testing.Dermatology, 197 3
A. Barbaud, M. Gonçalo, D. Bruynzeel, A. Bircher (2001)
Guidelines for performing skin tests withdrugs in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactionsContact Dermatitis, 45
S. Schmid, P. Kuechler, M. Britschgi, U. Steiner, N. Yawalkar, A. Limat, K. Baltensperger, L. Braathen, W. Pichler (2002)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis: role of cytotoxic T cells in pustule formation.The American journal of pathology, 161 6
M. Britschgi, W. Pichler (2002)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, a clue to neutrophil-mediated inflammatory processes orchestrated by T cellsCurrent Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 2
K. Andersen, N. Hjorth, T. Menné (1984)
The baboon syndrome: systemically‐induced allergic contact dermatitis *Contact Dermatitis, 10
(1986)
Address: Dr Hichem Belhadjali Department of Dermatology Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital Monastir 5000
(2001)
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) – a clinical reaction
S. Malakar, S. Dhar (1998)
Spontaneous repigmentation of vitiligo patches distant from the autologous skin graft sites: a remote reverse Koebner's phenomenon?Dermatology, 197 3
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) is characterized by the acute onset of fever with a generalized erythematous pustular eruption (1, 2) . It is drug induced in more than 90% of cases (1, 2) . However, it can be caused in rare cases by other agents such as mercury (2, 3) . We report a case of mercury‐induced AGEP that was misdiagnosed as a drug‐related one. Case Story An 18‐year‐old girl was treated with fluconazole (Funzol ® ; SAIPH, Sfax, Tunisia) 150 mg once a week for onychomycosis. 17 days after starting fluconazole, she developed a generalized eruption with fever (38.5 celsius). Physical examination showed several non‐follicular pustules occurring on a diffuse, oedematous erythema distributed all over the body with marked lesions on the trunk and folds. The patient denied any intake of other medications during the previous weeks and had no history of mercury exposure. Laboratory investigations showed a total white blood cell count at 11 000/μl with 70% neutrophils and 10% eosinophils. Blood and pustule cultures were negative. The mycological examination of a pustule was negative. A skin biopsy showed spongiform subcorneal pustules and perivascular infiltrates with neutrophils and eosinophils. The diagnosis of AGEP was made,
Contact Dermatitis – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.