Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Life-Cycle of Transnational Issues: Lessons from the Access to Medicines Controversy

The Life-Cycle of Transnational Issues: Lessons from the Access to Medicines Controversy Why and how do issues expire? This paper applies the concept of path dependency to issue-life cycle and argues that the manner in which an issue dies is closely associated with how it comes to life. This paper argues that, on the Access to Medicines issue, the first actors (1) to have called attention to a legal problem, (2) to have capitalised on the HIV/AIDs crisis, and (3) to have used the example of Africa, were also the first to have felt constrained by their own frame in their attempt to (1) look for economical rather than legal solutions, (2) expand the list of medicines covered beyond anti-AIDs drugs, and (3) allow large emerging economies to benefit from a scheme designed by countries without manufacturing capacities. In order to escape an issue in which they felt entrapped, issue-entrepreneurs worked strategically to close the debate in order to better reframe it in other forums. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Global Society Taylor & Francis

The Life-Cycle of Transnational Issues: Lessons from the Access to Medicines Controversy

Global Society , Volume 25 (2): 21 – Apr 1, 2011
21 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-life-cycle-of-transnational-issues-lessons-from-the-access-to-K764KdwOEn

References (13)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright University of Kent
ISSN
1469-798X
eISSN
1360-0826
DOI
10.1080/13600826.2011.553914
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Why and how do issues expire? This paper applies the concept of path dependency to issue-life cycle and argues that the manner in which an issue dies is closely associated with how it comes to life. This paper argues that, on the Access to Medicines issue, the first actors (1) to have called attention to a legal problem, (2) to have capitalised on the HIV/AIDs crisis, and (3) to have used the example of Africa, were also the first to have felt constrained by their own frame in their attempt to (1) look for economical rather than legal solutions, (2) expand the list of medicines covered beyond anti-AIDs drugs, and (3) allow large emerging economies to benefit from a scheme designed by countries without manufacturing capacities. In order to escape an issue in which they felt entrapped, issue-entrepreneurs worked strategically to close the debate in order to better reframe it in other forums.

Journal

Global SocietyTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 1, 2011

There are no references for this article.