Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Traditional versus iPad-mediated handwriting instruction in early learners

Traditional versus iPad-mediated handwriting instruction in early learners There has been a drastic increase in the use of technology in the classroom over the past 20 years. As computers and tablets permeate our schools, their presence is oftentimes seen as a cure to whatever problems may exist. While the promise of technology has held true within some domains, little has been done to examine its efficacy in some areas. The literature remains largely silent about the use of technology as a handwriting intervention in struggling learners. This study compared handwriting practice performed on iPads to handwriting practice performed through traditional means to determine the extent to which iPad-mediated handwriting practice transfers to traditional assessments. Twelve kindergarten and first-grade students from an urban public elementary school in central Texas participated in this small-scale study. The results indicate that traditional methods, while similar, were superior in terms of letter formation and letter orientation to iPad-mediated practice. Likewise, letter recognition increased for those using traditional handwriting methods but stayed stable for the iPad-mediated group. Similarly, iPad-mediated letter production was increased more so than with traditional methods. This study demonstrates a real world example of what an intervention looks like in a public school setting. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png "Journal Of Occupational Therapy, Schools & Early Intervention" Taylor & Francis

Traditional versus iPad-mediated handwriting instruction in early learners

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/traditional-versus-ipad-mediated-handwriting-instruction-in-early-KYnOaFp6yJ

References (42)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2016 Taylor & Francis
ISSN
1941-1251
eISSN
1941-1243
DOI
10.1080/19411243.2016.1176548
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

There has been a drastic increase in the use of technology in the classroom over the past 20 years. As computers and tablets permeate our schools, their presence is oftentimes seen as a cure to whatever problems may exist. While the promise of technology has held true within some domains, little has been done to examine its efficacy in some areas. The literature remains largely silent about the use of technology as a handwriting intervention in struggling learners. This study compared handwriting practice performed on iPads to handwriting practice performed through traditional means to determine the extent to which iPad-mediated handwriting practice transfers to traditional assessments. Twelve kindergarten and first-grade students from an urban public elementary school in central Texas participated in this small-scale study. The results indicate that traditional methods, while similar, were superior in terms of letter formation and letter orientation to iPad-mediated practice. Likewise, letter recognition increased for those using traditional handwriting methods but stayed stable for the iPad-mediated group. Similarly, iPad-mediated letter production was increased more so than with traditional methods. This study demonstrates a real world example of what an intervention looks like in a public school setting.

Journal

"Journal Of Occupational Therapy, Schools & Early Intervention" – Taylor & Francis

Published: Apr 2, 2016

Keywords: Handwriting; computers; early intervention; intervention studies

There are no references for this article.