Neo Martinez (1991)
Artifacts or Attributes? Effects of Resolution on the Little Rock Lake Food WebEcological Monographs, 61
K. McCann, A. Hastings (1997)
Re–evaluating the omnivory–stability relationship in food websProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264
N. Gotelli (2001)
Research frontiers in null model analysisGlobal Ecology and Biogeography, 10
M. Cattin, Louis-Félix Bersier, Carolin Banašek-Richter, R. Baltensperger, J. Gabriel (2004)
Phylogenetic constraints and adaptation explain food-web structureNature, 427
Alan Roberts, L. Stone (1990)
Island-sharing by archipelago speciesOecologia, 83
S. Pimm, J. Lawton (1980)
ARE FOOD WEBS DIVIDED INTO COMPARTMENTSJournal of Animal Ecology, 49
R. Milo, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, Reuven Levitt, S. Shen-Orr, Inbal Ayzenshtat, Michal Sheffer, U. Alon (2004)
Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed NetworksScience, 303
J. Cohen, F. Briand, C. Newman, Z. Palka (1990)
Community Food Webs: Data and Theory
D. Gale (1957)
A theorem on flows in networksPacific Journal of Mathematics, 7
Neo Martinez, Richard Williams, Neo Martinez (2000)
Simple rules yield complex food websNature, 404
A. Hastings, S. Harrison, K. McCann (1997)
Unexpected spatial patterns in an insect outbreak match a predator diffusion modelProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 264
M. Huxham, S. Beaney, D. Raffaelli (1996)
Do Parasites Reduce the Chances of Triangulation in a Real Food WebOikos, 76
G. Polis (1991)
Complex Trophic Interactions in Deserts: An Empirical Critique of Food-Web TheoryThe American Naturalist, 138
Yael Artzy‐Randrup, S. Fleishman, N. Ben-Tal, L. Stone (2004)
Comment on "Network Motifs: Simple Building Blocks of Complex Networks" and "Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks"Science, 305
E. Connor, D. Simberloff (1979)
The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition?Ecology, 60
W. Fagan (1997)
Omnivory as a Stabilizing Feature of Natural CommunitiesThe American Naturalist, 150
Louis-Félix Bersier, P. Dixon, G. Sugihara (1999)
Scale‐Invariant or Scale‐Dependent Behavior of the Link Density Property in Food Webs: A Matter of Sampling Effort?The American Naturalist, 153
J. Memmott, Neo Martinez, J. Cohen (2000)
Predators, parasitoids and pathogens: species richness, trophic generality and body sizes in a natural food webJournal of Animal Ecology, 69
George Sugihara, Kenneth Schoenly, Alan Trombla (1989)
Scale invariance in food web properties.Science, 245 4913
Terrance Williams, Michelle Pepitone, Scott Christensen, B. Cooke, A. Huberman, Nicholas Breedlove, Tessa Breedlove, C. Jordan, S. Breedlove (2000)
Finger-length ratios and sexual orientationNature, 404
R. Milo, S. Shen-Orr, S. Itzkovitz, N. Kashtan, D. Chklovskii, U. Alon (2002)
Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks.Science, 298 5594
G. Polis, R. Holt (1992)
Intraguild predation: The dynamics of complex trophic interactions.Trends in ecology & evolution, 7 5
Richard Williams, Neo Martinez (2004)
Limits to Trophic Levels and Omnivory in Complex Food Webs: Theory and DataThe American Naturalist, 163
K. McCann, A. Hastings, G. Huxel (1998)
Weak trophic interactions and the balance of natureNature, 395
J. Cohen (1977)
Ratio of prey to predators in community food websNature, 270
Carlos Melián, Jordi Bascompte (2004)
FOOD WEB COHESIONEcology, 85
N. Mawdsley, D. Reagan, R. Waide (1997)
The Food Web of a Tropical Rain ForestJournal of Animal Ecology, 66
M. Arim, P. Marquet (2004)
Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biologyEcology Letters, 7
G. Polis, D. Strong (1996)
Food Web Complexity and Community DynamicsThe American Naturalist, 147
J. Bascompte, Carlos Melián, E. Sala (2005)
Interaction strength combinations and the overfishing of a marine food web.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102 15
S. Pimm, J. Lawton (1977)
Number of trophic levels in ecological communitiesNature, 268
There are two common approaches to food webs. On the one hand, empirical studies have described aggregate statistical measures of many‐species food webs. On the other hand, theoretical studies have explored the dynamic properties of simple tri‐trophic food chains (i.e., trophic modules). The question remains to what extent results based on simple modules are relevant for whole food webs. Here we bridge between these two independent research agendas by exploring the relative frequency of different trophic modules in the five most resolved food webs. While apparent competition and intraguild predation are overrepresented when compared to a suite of null models, the frequency of omnivory highly varies across communities. Inferences about the representation of modules may also depend on the null model used for statistical significance.
Ecology – Wiley
Published: Nov 1, 2005
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.