Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/wiley/social-comparison-and-group-interest-in-ingroup-favouritism-LHb6xXc0xA
References (25)
-
H. Tajfel, A. Wilkes (1963)
Classification and quantitative judgement.British journal of psychology, 54
-
W. Paris, G. Budapest, H. Konstanz, C. Bristol, K. Oregon, A. Stirling (1972)
An experimental investigation into the formation of intergroup representationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 2
-
H. Tajfel, M. Billig, R. Bundy, C. Flament (1971)
Social categorization and intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1
-
G. Murphy (1932)
Experimental Social Psychology., 6
-
M. Sherif (1967)
Group Conflict and Co-operation: Their Social Psychology -
Turner Turner (1975b)
Social identity and social comparison : Some prospects for intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 5
-
H. Tajfel (1969)
Cognitive aspects of prejudiceJournal of Biosocial Science, 1
-
R. Blake, J. Mouton (1961)
Reactions to Intergroup Competition Under Win-Lose ConditionsManagement Science, 7
-
J. Turner (1975)
Social comparison and social identity: Some prospects for intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 5
-
W. Doise, A. Sinclair (1973)
The categorisation process in intergroup relationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 3
-
F. Heider (1958)
The psychology of interpersonal relations -
Avigdor Avigdor (1953)
Étude expérimentale de la genése des stéréotypesCahier Internationale de Sociologie, 14
-
J. Rabbie, G. Wilkens (1971)
Intergroup competition and its effect on intragroup and intergroup relationsEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 1
-
L. Diab (1970)
A study of intragroup and intergroup relations among experimentally produced small groups -
O. Harvey (1956)
An Experimental Investigation of Negative and Positive Relations Between Small Groups Through Judgmental Indices, 19
-
David Johnson (1967)
Use of role reversal in intergroup competition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7
-
Doise Doise, Weinberger Weinberger (1973)
Représentations masculines dans différentes situations de rencontres mixtesBulletin de Psychologie, 26
-
J. Rabbie, M. Horwitz (1969)
Arousal of ingroup-outgroup bias by a chance win or loss.Journal of personality and social psychology, 13 3
-
M. Billig, H. Tajfel (1973)
Social categorization and similarity in intergroup behaviourEuropean Journal of Social Psychology, 3
-
H. Tajfel, Michael Billic (1974)
Familiarity and categorization in intergroup behaviorJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10
-
B. Bass, G. Dunteman (1963)
Biases in the evaluation of one's own group, its allies and opponentsJournal of Conflict Resolution, 7
-
M. Billig (1976)
Social psychology and intergroup relations -
C. Ferguson, H. Kelley (1964)
SIGNIFICANT FACTORS IN OVEREVALUATION OF OWN-GROUP'S PRODUCT.Journal of abnormal psychology, 69
-
W. Wilson, M. Kayatani (1968)
Intergroup attitudes and strategies in games between opponents of the same or of a different race.Journal of personality and social psychology, 9 1
-
L. Festinger (1954)
A Theory of Social Comparison ProcessesHuman Relations, 7
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1979 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
- eISSN
- 1099-0992
- DOI
- 10.1002/ejsp.2420090207
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Studied the effects of reward magnitude and comparability of the outgroup on minimal intergroup discrimination where self‐interest was related to ingroup profit. Favouritism towards own group is hypothesized to arise from intergroup comparisons to enhance self‐esteem as well as instrumental rivalry for group and self‐interest. Sixty‐two fourteen to fifteen years' old school‐boys and girls were randomly assigned to a high or low reward condition in which they distributed monetary rewards, via choice‐matrices, to the ingroup and a relevant comparison outgroup, and the ingroup and an irrelevant comparison outgroup. Monetary self‐interest was explicitly and directly linked to ingroup's absolute profit. Ss sacrificed group and personal gain to achieve intergroup differences in monetary outcomes favouring the ingroup; and were less fair and more discriminatory towards the relevant than irrelevant outgroup. especially with High Rewards.
Journal
European Journal of Social Psychology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 1979