Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements*

Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements* Levels of coresidence of parents with adult children, particularly with married children, remain high and surprisingly stable over time in urban China. Analysis of new survey data reveals that in some ways coresidence is consistent with traditional patterns: it is patrilocal, and it responds more clearly to parents' needs than to children's needs. Nevertheless, researchers have shown that most parents and children do not prefer coresidence. Statepolicies that reinforce gender bias, limit state support for social services, and reduce housing opportunities may be as important as traditional values in preserving older family patterns. Comparison of recent trends in Tianjin and Shanghai suggests that coresidence may decline sharply if external constraints on people's choices are relaxed. The impact of the one-child family policy will be felt at the turn of the century, greatly reducing the proportion of parents who may live with their adult child, but the way that families deal with this change cannot be foreseen. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Social Forces Oxford University Press

Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements*

Social Forces , Volume 76 (3) – Mar 1, 1998

Loading next page...
 
/lp/oxford-university-press/tradition-and-change-in-the-urban-chinese-family-the-case-of-living-LcQ7FkD5kM

References (31)

Publisher
Oxford University Press
Copyright
© Published by Oxford University Press.
Subject
Articles
ISSN
0037-7732
eISSN
1534-7605
DOI
10.1093/sf/76.3.851
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Levels of coresidence of parents with adult children, particularly with married children, remain high and surprisingly stable over time in urban China. Analysis of new survey data reveals that in some ways coresidence is consistent with traditional patterns: it is patrilocal, and it responds more clearly to parents' needs than to children's needs. Nevertheless, researchers have shown that most parents and children do not prefer coresidence. Statepolicies that reinforce gender bias, limit state support for social services, and reduce housing opportunities may be as important as traditional values in preserving older family patterns. Comparison of recent trends in Tianjin and Shanghai suggests that coresidence may decline sharply if external constraints on people's choices are relaxed. The impact of the one-child family policy will be felt at the turn of the century, greatly reducing the proportion of parents who may live with their adult child, but the way that families deal with this change cannot be foreseen.

Journal

Social ForcesOxford University Press

Published: Mar 1, 1998

There are no references for this article.