Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
N. Emery, E. Lorincz, D. Perrett, M. Oram, C. Baker (1997)
Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Journal of comparative psychology, 111 3
Larry Coutts, F. Schneider (1976)
Affiliative conflict theory: An investigation of the intimacy equilibrium and compensation hypothesis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34
(2014)
Trust in me: trustworthy others are seen as more physically similar to the self
D. Perrett, P. Smith, D. Potter, A. Mistlin, A. Head, A. Milner, M. Jeeves (1985)
Visual cells in the temporal cortex sensitive to face view and gaze directionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences, 223
K. Nichols, B. Champness (1971)
Eye gaze and the GSRJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7
K. Haley, D. Fessler (2005)
Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game.Evolution and Human Behavior, 26
David DeSteno, C. Breazeal, R. Frank, David Pizarro, Jolie Baumann, Leah Dickens, Jin Lee (2012)
Detecting the Trustworthiness of Novel Partners in Economic ExchangePsychological Science, 23
Bilge Mutlu, J. Forlizzi, J. Hodgins (2006)
A Storytelling Robot: Modeling and Evaluation of Human-like Gaze Behavior2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots
J. Devito (1996)
Human Communication: The Basic Course
L. Takayama, C. Pantofaru (2009)
Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems
Jaap Ham, R. Bokhorst, R. Cuijpers, D. Pol, J. Cabibihan (2011)
Making Robots Persuasive: The Influence of Combining Persuasive Strategies (Gazing and Gestures) by a Storytelling Robot on Its Persuasive Power
F. Broz, H. Lehmann, Chrystopher Nehaniv, K. Dautenhahn (2012)
Mutual gaze, personality, and familiarity: Dual eye-tracking during conversation2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication
A. Vrij (2000)
Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice
(2013)
SchneM,HeinrichsM (2013) In the eye of the beholder: eye contact increases resistance to persuasion
Jonathan Mumm, Bilge Mutlu (2011)
Human-robot proxemics: Physical and psychological distancing in human-robot interaction2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
C. Stanton, C. Stevens (2014)
Robot Pressure: The Impact of Robot Eye Gaze and Lifelike Bodily Movements upon Decision-Making and Trust
A. Sparks, Pat Barclay (2013)
Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cueEvolution and Human Behavior, 34
S. Mann, A. Vrij, R. Bull (2004)
Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.The Journal of applied psychology, 89 1
A. Mazur, E. Rosa, M. Faupel, J. Heller, R. Leen, B. Thurman (1980)
Physiological Aspects of Communication Via Mutual GazeAmerican Journal of Sociology, 86
(1974)
The meaning of 5 patterns of gaze
Gordon Hemsley, A. Doob (1978)
The effect of looking behavior on perceptions of a communicator's credibilityJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 8
A. Kendon (1967)
Some functions of gaze-direction in social interaction.Acta psychologica, 26 1
C. Kleinke (1980)
Interaction between gaze and legitimacy of request on compliance in a field settingJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 5
C. Kleinke, David Singer (1979)
Influence of Gaze on Compliance with Demanding and Conciliatory Requests in a Field SettingPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5
J. Harrigan, T. Oxman, R. Rosenthal (1985)
Rapport expressed through nonverbal behaviorJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9
A. Feingold (1992)
Good-looking people are not what we think.Psychological Bulletin, 111
M. Argyle, M. Cook, Duncan Cramer (1994)
Gaze and Mutual GazeBritish Journal of Psychiatry, 165
(1985)
Communication by posture and facial expression in the rhesus monkey
Effects of teacher gaze on childrens story recall
N. Guéguen (2013)
Handshaking and compliance with a request: A door-to-door settingSocial Behavior and Personality, 41
P. Ekman, W. Friesen, Maureen O’Sullivan (1988)
Smiles when lying.Journal of personality and social psychology, 54 3
S. Mann, A. Vrij, Sharon Leal, P. Granhag, L. Warmelink, Dave Forrester (2012)
Windows to the Soul? Deliberate Eye Contact as a Cue to DeceitJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 36
(2007)
Believed cues to deception: judgements in self-generated serious and trivial situations
S. Einav, B. Hood (2008)
Tell-tale eyes: children's attribution of gaze aversion as a lying cue.Developmental psychology, 44 6
C. Kleinke (1986)
Gaze and eye contact: a research review.Psychological bulletin, 100 1
Vijay Chidambaram, Yueh-Hsuan Chiang, Bilge Mutlu (2012)
Designing persuasive robots: How robots might persuade people using vocal and nonverbal cues2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI)
R. Wheeler, Joan Baron, Susan Michell, H. Ginsburg (1979)
Eye contact and the perception of intelligenceBulletin of the psychonomic society, 13
M. Knapp (1972)
Nonverbal communication in human interaction
M. Snyder, John Grather, K. Keller (1974)
Staring and Compliance: A Field Experiment on HitchhikingJournal of Applied Social Psychology, 4
J. Burgoon, V. Manusov, Paul Mineo, Jerold Hale (1985)
Effects of gaze on hiring, credibility, attraction and relational message interpretationJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 9
Christopher Olivola, A. Todorov (2010)
Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-Based Trait Inferences and VotingJournal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34
Bella Paulo, M. Zuckerman, R. Rosenthal (1980)
Humans as lie detectors.The Journal of communication, 30 2
FS Chen, JA Minson, M Schne, M Heinrichs (2013)
In the eye of the beholder: eye contact increases resistance to persuasionPsychol Sci, 24
S. Mann, S. Ewens, D. Shaw, A. Vrij, Sharon Leal, Jackie Hillman (2013)
Lying Eyes: Why Liars Seek Deliberate Eye ContactPsychiatry, Psychology and Law, 20
A. Siegman, S. Feldstein (2014)
Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior
S. Thayer (1969)
The Effect of Interpersonal Looking Duration on Dominance JudgmentsJournal of Social Psychology, 79
L. Tickle-Degnen, R. Rosenthal (1990)
The Nature of Rapport and Its Nonverbal CorrelatesPsychological Inquiry, 1
R. Feldman, B. Rimé (1991)
Fundamentals of nonverbal behavior
E. Fehr, Frédéric Schneider (2009)
Eyes are on us, but nobody cares: are eye cues relevant for strong reciprocity?Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277
R. Bull, Elizabeth Gibson-Robinson (1981)
The Influences of Eye-Gaze, Style of Dress, and Locality on the Amounts of Money Donated to a CharityHuman Relations, 34
S. Langton, R. Watt, V. Bruce (2000)
Do the eyes have it? Cues to the direction of social attentionTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 4
P. Hancock, D. Billings, Kristin Schaefer, Jessie Chen, E. Visser, R. Parasuraman (2011)
A Meta-Analysis of Factors Affecting Trust in Human-Robot InteractionHuman Factors: The Journal of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 53
N. Murphy (2007)
Appearing Smart: The Impression Management of Intelligence, Person Perception Accuracy, and Behavior in Social InteractionPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33
Nisha Bhaskaran, Ifeoma Nwogu, M. Frank, V. Govindaraju (2011)
Lie to Me: Deceit detection via online behavioral learningFace and Gesture 2011
M. LaFrance, Maida Broadbent (1976)
Group Rapport: Posture Sharing as a Nonverbal IndicatorGroup & Organization Management, 1
Gaze is an important tool for social communication. Gaze can influence trust, likability, and compliance. However, excessive gaze in some contexts can signal threat, dominance and aggression, and hence complex social rules govern the appropriate use of gaze. Using a between-subjects design we investigated the impact of three levels of robot gaze (averted, constant and “situational”) upon participants’ likelihood of trusting a humanoid robot’s opinion in a cooperative visual tracking task. The robot, acting as a confederate, would disagree with participants’ responses on certain trials, and suggest a different answer. As constant, staring gaze between strangers is associated with dominance and threat, and averted gaze is associated with lying, we predicted participants would be most likely to be persuaded by a robot which only gazed during disagreements (“situational gaze”). However, gender effects were found, with females least likely to trust a robot which stared at them, and no significant differences between averted gaze and situational gaze. Implications and future work are discussed.
International Journal of Social Robotics – Springer Journals
Published: Aug 19, 2017
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.