Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/assessing-the-predictive-validity-of-the-admission-process-in-a-master-MCNHYkFNGs
References (17)
-
(2009) The Praxis Series
Princeton, NJ -
R
, Hezlett S -
(2002) Fair game? The use of standardized admissions in higher education
New York: Routledge Farmer -
, Naremore R
C -
(1993) What matters in college? Four critical years revisited
San Francisco: Jossey-Bass -
Peter Sacks (1999)
Standardized Minds: The High Price Of America's Testing Culture And What We Can Do To Change It -
J
, Williams W -
A. Astin (1994)
What matters in college? : four critical years revisitedThe Journal of Higher Education, 65
-
H. Rosovsky, M. Hartley, P. Altbach, S. Bok, C. Fried, C. Gibaldi, J. Kagan, D. Whitla, Leslie Berlowitz, C. Schelling (2002)
Evaluation and the Academy: Are We Doing the Right Thing? -
(1999) Standardized minds: the high price of America's testing culture and what we can do to change it
Cambridge, MA: Perseus -
(2002)
Fair game? The use of standardized admissions in higher education. New york: routledge Falmer -
Marc Johnston (2014)
Assessment for Excellence: The Philosophy and Practice of Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education (2nd ed.) by Alexander W. Astin and Anthony Lising Antonio (review)Journal of College Student Development, 55
-
(1983)
naremore, r. C. (1998) analysis of criteria for graduate admissions in speech-language pathology: predictive utility of application materials -
, Hartley M
(2002) Evaluation and the Academy: are we doing the right thing? Cambridge, MA: American Academy of Arts and Sciences -
(2002)
Fair game? The use of standardized admissions in higher education -
(1983) The application of a model of turnover in work organizations to the student attrition process
The Review of Higher Education, 6, 129–148 -
(1991) Assessment for excellence: the philosophy and practice of assessment and evaluation in higher education
New York: Macmillan
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © 2012 SAGE Publications
- ISSN
- 0033-2941
- eISSN
- 1558-691X
- DOI
- 10.2466/03.15.28.pr0.111.5.613-617
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Abstract Astin's Input-Environment-Outcome (I-E-O) model served as the theoretical foundation to assess (a) undergraduate GPA, (b) undergraduate Speech Language Pathology majors, and (c, d) GRE-Q and GRE-V scores (Input) as predictors of students' graduate GPA (Environment), and graduate GPA as a predictor of PRAXIS scores (Outcome). The sample for this study was 122 students who completed the Speech-Language Pathology Program in recent academic cycles at a graduate school in the northeastern United States. The sample was representative of other programs in the country in terms of gender, undergraduate GPA, and GRE scores. Results appear to support the predictive validity of the linear combination of the input predictors of the environment variable (GPA) and of the environment variable on the outcome, i.e., PRAXIS scores.
Journal
Psychological Reports – SAGE
Published: Oct 1, 2012