Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Campbell, J. T. Dickey, P. Swanson (2003)
Endocrine changes during onset of puberty in male spring Chinook Salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, 69
H. Araki, B. A. Berejikian, M. J. Ford, M. S. Blouin (2008)
Fitness of hatchery‐reared salmonids in the wild, 1
B. Cuisset, P. Pradelles, D. E. Kime, E. R. Kuhn, P. Babin, S. Davail, F. Le Menn (1994)
Enzyme immunoassay for 11‐ketotestosterone using acetylcholinesterase as label: Application to the measurement of 11‐ketotestosterone in plasma of Siberian Sturgeon, 108
H. Akaike (1974)
A new look at the statistical model identification, 19
W. C. Clarke, J. Blackburn (1994)
Effect of growth on early sexual maturation in stream‐type Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), 121
J.‐E. Dessen, R. Weihe, B. Hatlen, M. S. Thomassen, K.‐A. Rørvik (2017)
Different growth performance, lipid deposition, and nutrient utilization in in‐season (S1) Atlantic Salmon post‐smolt fed isoenergetic diets differing in protein‐to‐lipid ratio, 473
M. Ford, A. Murdoch, S. Howard (2012)
Early male maturity explains a negative correlation in reproductive success between hatchery‐spawned salmon and their naturally spawning progeny, 5
H. D. Bowlby, A. J. F. Gibson (2011)
Reduction in fitness limits the useful duration of supplementary rearing in an endangered salmon population, 21
D. E. Fast, W. J. Bosch, M. V. Johnston, C. R. Strom, C. M. Knudsen, A. L. Fritts, G. M. Temple, T. N. Pearsons, D. A. Larsen, A. H. Dittman, D. May (2015)
A synthesis of findings from an integrated hatchery program after three generations of spawning in the natural environment, 77
M. J. Ford (2002)
Selection in captivity during supportive breeding may reduce fitness in the wild, 16
K. M. Cogliati, J. R. Unrein, W. M. Sealey, F. T. Barrows, O. Hakanson, R. Chitwood, D. L. G. Noakes, C. B. Schreck (2019)
Low‐lipid diets fed at reduced ration: Effects on growth, body composition, and survival of juvenile Chinook Salmon, 10
B. R. Beckman, D. L. Harstad, D. K. Spangenberg, R. S. Gerstenberger, C. V. Brun, D. A. Larsen (2017)
The impact of different hatchery rearing environments on smolt‐to‐adult survival of spring Chinook Salmon, 146
B. R. Beckman, B. Gadberry, P. Parkins, K. A. Cooper, K. D. Arkush (2007)
State‐dependent life history plasticity in Sacramento River winter‐run Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha): Interactions among photoperiod and growth modulate smolting and early male maturation, 64
L. R. Clarke, W. A. Cameron, R. S. Hogg, R. W. Carmichael, S. T. Onjukka, M. G. White, J. Keniry (2014)
Umatilla monitoring and evaluation annual report: 2013
B. R. Beckman (2011)
Perspectives on concordant and discordant relations between insulin‐like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and growth in fishes, 170
D. R. Cox, E. J. Snell (1989)
Analysis of binary data
W. H. Daughaday, I. K. Mariz, S. L. Blethen (1980)
Inhibition of access of bound somatomedin to membrane receptor and immunobinding sites: A comparison of radioreceptor and radioimmunoassay of somatomedin in native and acid‐ethanol‐extracted serum, 51
INTRODUCTIONSalmon hatchery programs have been implemented throughout the Columbia and Snake River basins in the Pacific Northwest to mitigate for stock losses as a result of hydropower development, urbanization, agriculture, fisheries, and forestry practices (Lichatowich 1999; Waples et al. 2007). Although some hatchery programs have successfully increased the numbers of returning adult fish (Kline and Flagg 2014; Fast et al. 2015), undesirable consequences of hatchery culture have been observed, including genotypic and phenotypic changes that have been implicated in the reduced fitness of hatchery fish when spawning in the wild (Reisenbichler and Rubin 1999; Ford 2002; Reisenbichler et al. 2004; Waples et al. 2004; Araki et al. 2008; Bowlby and Gibson 2011; Ford et al. 2012). Of particular note, several previous studies have documented the release of hundreds of thousands of male Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus tshawytscha that have initiated early maturation as age‐2 minijacks each year from hatchery programs throughout the Columbia River basin (range = 7.9–71.4% of males, depending on the program; Larsen et al. 2004a, 2013, 2019a, 2019b; Harstad et al. 2014, 2018; Spangenberg et al. 2014, 2015; Beckman et al. 2017). This circumstance is unfortunate, as these early maturing males do not add to hatchery program goals, including contributions to harvest of adults or supplementation of natural populations by full‐size breeding adults. The
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: Chinook Salmon; diet manipulation; growth; hatchery; IGF‐I; minijacks
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.