Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
H. Kanamori (1966)
Determination of Optimum Film Density Range for Roentgenograms from Visual EffectsActa Radiologica, 4
Y. Asai, Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, M. Matsumoto, H. Kanamori (1995)
Psychophysical RMS granularity for the evaluation of radiographic mottleJ. Photogr. Sci., 43
(1979)
Recommended levels of illumination
Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, M. Matsumoto, H. Kanamori (1993)
Frequency Dependence of Minimum Perceptible Contrasts of Radiographs and MTF of the EyeThe Imaging Science Journal, 41
(1999)
Gray scale standard display function, Part 14
A. Patel (1966)
Spatial resolution by the human visual system. The effect of mean retinal illuminance.Journal of the Optical Society of America, 56 5
P. Moon, D. E. Spencer (1945)
Visual effect of non-uniform surroundsJ. Opt. Soc. Am., 35
Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, M. Matsumoto, H. Kanamori (1993)
Frequency dependence of minimum perceptible contrasts and optimum film densities of radiographsJ. Photogr. Sci., 41
C. R. Carlson (1982)
Sine-wave threshold contrast-sensitivity function: dependence on display sizeRCA Review, 43
H. Kanamori (1966)
Effects of Roentgen Tube Voltage and Current Waveforms in Radiography, 4
P. Moon, D. Spencer (1945)
THE VISUAL EFFECT OF NON-UNIFORM SURROUNDS:Optometry and Vision Science
M. Matsumoto, Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, Y. Asai, H. Kanamori (1995)
Equivalent spatial frequency and optimum film densities for the perceptibility of radiographic contrast of step-edge imagesThe Imaging Science Journal, 43
F. Nes, M. Bouman (1967)
Spatial Modulation Transfer in the Human EyeJournal of the Optical Society of America, 57
Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, M. Matsumoto, H. Kanamori (1993)
Frequency dependence of minimum perceptible contrasts of radiographs and MTF of the eyeJ. Photogr. Sci., 41
Prof. Virsu, J. Rovamo (2004)
Visual resolution, contrast sensitivity, and the cortical magnification factorExperimental Brain Research, 37
F. Campbell, J. Robson (1968)
Application of fourier analysis to the visibility of gratingsThe Journal of Physiology, 197
A. Watanabe, T. Mori, S. Nagata, K. Hiwatashi (1968)
Spatial sine-wave responses of the human visual system.Vision research, 8 9
J. J. Depalma, E. M. Lowry (1962)
Sine-wave response of the visual system. Sine-wave and square-wave sensitivityJ. Opt. Soc. Amer., 52
M. Matsumoto, Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, Y. Asai, H. Kanamori (1995)
Equivalent spatial frequency and optimum film densities for the perceptibility of radiographic contrast of step-edge imagesJ. Photogr. Sci., 43
P. Barten (1992)
Physical model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye, 1666
Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, M. Matsumoto, H. Kanamori (1993)
Frequency dependence of minimum perceptible contrasts and optimum film densities of radiographsThe Imaging Science Journal, 41
A. Meeteren, J. Vos (1972)
Resolution and contrast sensitivity at low luminances.Vision research, 12 5
P. Barten (1993)
Spatiotemporal model for the contrast sensitivity of the human eye and its temporal aspects, 1913
M. Yamaguchi, H. Fujita, M. Uemura, Y. Asai, H. Wakae, M. Ishifuro (2004)
Development and evaluation of a new gray-scale test pattern to adjust gradients of thoracic CT imagingEuropean Radiology, 14
Y. Asai, Y. Ozaki, H. Kubota, M. Matsumoto, H. Kanamori (1995)
Psychophysical RMS Granularity for the Evaluation of Radiographic MottleThe Imaging Science Journal, 43
H. Kanamori (1964)
The Determination of the Optimum Density and the Density-Range of Radiographs from Visual EffectsJapanese Journal of Applied Physics, 3
J. DePalma, E. Lowry (1962)
Sine-Wave Response of the Visual System. II. Sine-Wave and Square-Wave Contrast Sensitivity*†Journal of the Optical Society of America, 52
The digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) standard proposed the grey-scale standard display function (GSDF) as a calibration tool for making the gradation characteristic of a radiographic output image consistent. This is designed in such a manner that the contrast visually recognised by observers (called psychophysical contrast) becomes a constant for all digital driving levels. The DICOM standard calls such an ideal characteristic perceptual linearisation. The psychophysical gradient that can express the psychophysical contrast was introduced for the evaluation of the GSDF using a liquid crystal display monitor. Investigations regarding its ability to yield a constant psychophysical contrast, independent of the digital driving level change and under an actual observation environment, such as for clinical radiographic diagnosis in hospital, were carried out. The psychophysical gradients of the GSDF were obtained for two kinds of observation environment: one was a restricted environment such as in a dark room, under steady-state adaptation, using the sinusoidal grading pattern corresponding to the peak frequency of the human eye response. The other was an actual environment reflecting that encountered during clinical diagnosis in a hospital. As a result, the psychophysical gradient under the restricted environment became almost constant and independent of the change in digital driving level, i.e. perceptual linearisation could be satisfied. Furthermore, under the actual observation environment, the psychophysical gradient decreased gradually with the increase in digital driving level, i.e. the perceptual linearisation could not be satisfied. The percentage decrease in the value of the psychophysical gradient at the maximum luminance area was approximately 60% compared with that at the minimum luminance area. Accordingly, the GSDF is unsuitable as a calibration tool for the liquid crystal display monitor, which will be used in actual clinical diagnosis, as it cannot achieve ‘perceptual linearisation’ under the actual environment. For the purpose of clinical diagnosis, it is necessary to enlarge the physical gradient of GSDF further in the high digital driving level range (which relates to a high luminance area) to give an approximation that is as close to the idealised from as possible.
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing – Springer Journals
Published: Feb 22, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.