Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/impressions-of-disadvantage-ii-monitoring-and-assisting-the-student-at-N1MlEMHkXV
References (27)
-
F. Overwalle, Karine Segebarth, Marc Goldchstein (1989)
IMPROVING PERFORMANCE OF FRESHMEN THROUGH ATTRIBUTIONAL TESTIMONIES FROM FELLOW STUDENTSBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 59
-
A. Cliff (1992)
The "educationally disadvantaged" student : factors impacting upon conceptions of learning and perceptions of learning contexts -
G. Gibbs (1990)
Improving student learning project. Briefing, Paper for Participants in the Project -
E. Martin, P. Ramsden (1987)
Student Learning -
F. Overwalle, M. Metsenaere (1990)
THE EFFECTS OF ATTRIBUTION‐BASED INTERVENTION AND STUDY STRATEGY TRAINING ON ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN COLLEGE FRESHMENBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 60
-
J. Vermunt, Frank Rijswijk (1988)
Analysis and development of students' skill in selfregulated learningHigher Education, 17
-
P. Ramsden, D.G. Beswick, J.A. Bowden (1986)
Effects of learning skills interventions on first year university students' learningHuman Learning, 5
-
J.H.F. Meyer, T.T. Dunne, A.R. Sass (1992)
Impressions of disadvantage. I-school versus university study orchestration and implications for academic supportHigher Education, 24
-
N. Entwistle, J. Meyer, H. Tait (1991)
Student failure: Disintegrated patterns of study strategies and perceptions of the learning environmentHigher Education, 21
-
J. Meyer (1991)
Study orchestration: the manifestation, interpretation and consequences of contextualised approaches to studyingHigher Education, 22
-
Jhf Meyer, R. Watson (1991)
Evaluating the Quality of Student Learning, II--Study Orchestration and the Curriculum.Studies in Higher Education, 16
-
J. Meyer, A. Sass (1992)
Engineering students from educationally disadvantaged backgrounds: assumptions. Research conclusions, and curriculum responsesInternational Journal of Engineering Education, 8
-
Jhf Meyer, M. Muller (1990)
Evaluating the quality of student learning. I—An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaches to studying at an individual levelStudies in Higher Education, 15
-
J. Biggs (1985)
THE ROLE OF METALEARNING IN STUDY PROCESSESBritish Journal of Educational Psychology, 55
-
Gareth Williams (1947)
What educational planning is aboutHigher Education, 1
-
J.D. Novak (1985)
Cognitive Structure and Conceptual Change -
E. Martin, P. Ramsden (1987)
Learning skills, or skill in learning? -
J. Meyer, A. Sass (1993)
The impact of the first year on the learning behaviour of engineering studentsInternational Journal of Engineering Education, 9
-
J. Meyer, P. Parsons, T. Dunne (1990)
Individual study orchestrations and their association with learning outcomeHigher Education, 20
-
J. Biggs (1979)
Individual differences in study processes and the Quality of Learning OutcomesHigher Education, 8
-
P. Parsons (1992)
An investigation into the association between qualitatively different perceptions of the learning context and students' approaches to studying -
J. Meyer, T. Dunne (1991)
Study approaches of nursing students: effects of an extended clinical contextMedical Education, 25
-
J.G. Biggs, B.A. Rihn (1984)
Cognitive strategies and educational performance -
P. Parsons, Jan Meyer (1990)
The academically ‘at risk’ student: a pilot intervention programme and its observed effects on learning outcomeHigher Education, 20
-
N. Entwistle, P. Ramsden (1983)
Understanding Student Learning -
N. Eizenberg (1988)
Improving Learning: New Perspectives -
J. Meyer, T. Dunne, A. Sass (1992)
Impressions of disadvantage: I — school versus university study orchestration and consequences for academic supportHigher Education, 24
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright
- Subject
- Education; Higher Education
- ISSN
- 0018-1560
- eISSN
- 1573-174X
- DOI
- 10.1007/BF01383763
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Two studies on monitoring and assisting students at risk are presented against a contemporary perspective in higher education: that of monitoring and developing the quality of student learning. A basis for risk categorisation at an individual level is outlined, and the effects of an intervention aimed at students at risk are evaluated in two contrasting settings. ‘At risk’ in the present study represents, in conceptual terms, a relatively extreme set of learning behaviours.
Journal
Higher Education – Springer Journals
Published: Mar 12, 2005