Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Christopher Podlesnik, T. Shahan (2008)
Response–reinforcer relations and resistance to changeBehavioural Processes, 77
P. Friman, K. Altman (1990)
Parent use of DRI on high rate disruptive behavior: direct and collateral benefits.Research in developmental disabilities, 11 2
Christopher Podlesnik, John Bai, D. Elliffe (2012)
Resistance to extinction and relapse in combined stimulus contexts.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 98 2
A. Mclean, Campbell-Tie, J. Nevin (1996)
Resistance To Change As A Function Of Stimulus-reinforcer And Location-reinforcer Contingencies.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 66 2
Christopher Podlesnik, M. Kelley (2014)
Resurgence: Response competition, stimulus control, and reinforcer control.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 102 2
J. Nevin (2012)
Resistance to extinction and behavioral momentumBehavioural Processes, 90
F. Mace, J. McComas, Benjamin Mauro, P. Progar, B. Taylor, R. Ervin, Amanda Zangrillo (2010)
Differential reinforcement of alternative behavior increases resistance to extinction: clinical demonstration, animal modeling, and clinical test of one solution.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 93 3
J. Staddon, Virginia Simmelhag (1971)
The "supersitition" experiment: A reexamination of its implications for the principles of adaptive behavior.Psychological Review, 78
K. Lionello-DeNolf, W. Dube (2011)
Contextual influences on resistance to disruption in children with intellectual disabilities.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 96 3
W. Ahearn, Kathy Clark, N. Gardenier, B. Chung, W. Dube (2003)
Persistence of stereotypic behavior: examining the effects of external reinforcers.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 36 4
Christopher Podlesnik, Corina Jimenez‐Gomez, Ryan Ward, T. Shahan (2006)
Resistance to change of responding maintained by unsignaled delays to reinforcement: a response-bout analysis.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 85 3
J. Carr, J. Severtson, Tracy Lepper (2009)
Noncontingent reinforcement is an empirically supported treatment for problem behavior exhibited by individuals with developmental disabilities.Research in developmental disabilities, 30 1
Diana Parry‐Cruwys, Carrie Neal, W. Ahearn, Emily Wheeler, Raseeka Premchander, Melissa Loeb, W. Dube (2011)
Resistance to disruption in a classroom setting.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 44 2
E. Petscher, Catalina Rey, J. Bailey (2009)
A review of empirical support for differential reinforcement of alternative behavior.Research in developmental disabilities, 30 3
M. Fleshler, H. Hoffman (1962)
A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 5
K. Lattal (1989)
Contingencies on response rate and resistance to changeLearning and Motivation, 20
R. Herrnstein, D. Loveland (1975)
MAXIMIZING AND MATCHING ON CONCURRENT RATIO SCHEDULES1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24
J. Nevin, J. Nevin, Mary Tota, Mary Tota, Richard Torquato, Richard Torquato, R. Shull, R. Shull (1990)
Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 53 3
Christopher Podlesnik, John Bai (2015)
Method of stimulus combination impacts resistance to extinction.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 104 1
Neil Winterbauer, M. Bouton (2010)
Mechanisms of resurgence of an extinguished instrumental behavior.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes, 36 3
Christopher Podlesnik, I. DeLeon (2015)
Behavioral Momentum Theory: Understanding Persistence and Improving Treatment
D. Schaal, T. Shahan, C. Kovera, M. Reilly (1998)
Mechanisms underlying the effects of unsignaled delayed reinforcement on key pecking of pigeons under variable-interval schedules.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 69 2
T. Vollmer, B. Iwata (1992)
Differential reinforcement as treatment for behavior disorders: procedural and functional variations.Research in developmental disabilities, 13 4
M. Sweeney, Keira Moore, T. Shahan, W. Ahearn, W. Dube, J. Nevin (2014)
Modeling the effects of sensory reinforcers on behavioral persistence with alternative reinforcement.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 102 2
J. Nevin (2003)
Mathematical principles of reinforcement and resistance to changeBehavioural Processes, 62
J. Nevin, D. Wacker (2013)
Response strength and persistence.
I. DeLeon, Christopher Podlesnik, Jonathan Miller (2015)
Implications of Behavioral Momentum Theory for Intervention in Autism Spectrum Disorder
A. Catania (1963)
Concurrent performances: a baseline for the study of reinforcement magnitude.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 6
J. Nevin, R. Grace (2000)
Behavioral momentum and the Law of EffectBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 23
J. Nevin, A. Mclean, R. Grace (2001)
Resistance to extinction: contingency termination and generalization decrementAnimal Learning & Behavior, 29
Studies of behavioral momentum reveal that reinforcing an alternative response in the presence of a target response reduces the rate of target responding but increases its persistence, relative to training the target response on its own. Because of the parallels between these studies and differential‐reinforcement techniques to reduce problem behavior in clinical settings, alternative techniques to reduce problem behavior without enhancing its persistence are being explored. One potential solution is to train an alternative response in a separate stimulus context from problem behavior before combining the alternative stimulus with the target stimulus. The present study assessed how differences in reinforcement contingencies and rate for alternative responding influenced resistance to extinction of target responding when combining alternative and target stimuli in pigeons. Across three experiments, alternative stimuli signaling a response–reinforcer dependency and greater reinforcer rates more effectively decreased the persistence of target responding when combining alternative and target stimuli within the same extinction tests, but not when compared across separate extinction tests. Overall, these findings reveal that differences in competition between alternative and target responding produced by contingencies of alternative reinforcement could influence the effectiveness of treating problem behavior through combining stimulus contexts.
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior – Wiley
Published: May 1, 2016
Keywords: ; ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.