Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Robert Erikson, K. Tedin (1981)
The 1928–1936 Partisan Realignment: The Case for the Conversion HypothesisAmerican Political Science Review, 75
Robert Luskin, John McIver, E. Carmines (1989)
Issues and the Transmission of PartisanshipAmerican Journal of Political Science, 33
H. Stanley (1988)
Southern Partisan Changes: Dealignment, Realignment or Both?The Journal of Politics, 50
P. Beck (1979)
The Electoral Cycle and Patterns of American PoliticsBritish Journal of Political Science, 9
E. Carmines, James Stimson (1981)
Issue Evolution, Population Replacement, and Normal Partisan ChangeAmerican Political Science Review, 75
A. Przeworski (1975)
Institutionalization of Voting Patterns, or is Mobilization the Source of Decay?American Political Science Review, 69
R. Inglehart, A. Hochstein (1972)
Alignment and Dealignment of the Electorate in France and the United StatesComparative Political Studies, 5
E. Carmines, James Stimson (1986)
On the Structure and Sequence of Issue EvolutionAmerican Political Science Review, 80
Michal Shamir (1984)
Are Western Party Systems “Frozen”?Comparative Political Studies, 17
R. Rose, D. Urwin (1970)
Persistence and Change in Western Party Systems since 1945Political Studies, 18
E. Carmines, J. Gopoian (1981)
Issue Coalitions, Issueless Campaigns: the Paradox of Rationality in American Presidential ElectionsThe Journal of Politics, 43
John Petrocik (1987)
Realignment: New Party Coalitions and the Nationalization of the SouthThe Journal of Politics, 49
L. Leduc (1985)
Partisan Change and Dealignment in Canada, Great Britain, and the United StatesComparative politics, 17
P. Beck (1982)
REALIGNMENT BEGINS?American Politics Research, 10
E. Carmines, John McIver, James Stimson (1987)
Unrealized Partisanship: A Theory of DealignmentThe Journal of Politics, 49
Scott Flanagan, R. Dalton (1984)
Parties under stress: Realignment and dealignment in advanced industrial societiesWest European Politics, 7
P. Mair (1989)
The Problem of Party System ChangeJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1
P. Beck, M. Jennings (1975)
Parents as "Middlepersons" in Political SocializationThe Journal of Politics, 37
R. Salisbury, Michael Mackuen (1981)
On the Study of Party RealignmentThe Journal of Politics, 43
P. Converse (1969)
Of Time and Partisan StabilityComparative Political Studies, 2
Stuart Macdonald, G. Rabinowitz (1987)
The Dynamics of Structural RealignmentAmerican Political Science Review, 81
This paper presents a theoretical framework for analyzing change in party alignments that highlights their underlying logic and dynamic evolution. The framework is based on three analytical concepts - opportunity, motive and means. The opportunity for partisan change increases as party alignments age because aging alignments include a growing proportion of incompletely socialized and weakly aligned citizens. Motive is ever-present because of losing, but rational-calculating politicians need to dislodge the current majority and institute one of their own. And the means of partisan change are provided by powerful new issues that can split the majority party's fragile coalition. It is the dynamic interaction among these three elements that leads to the natural evolution of party alignments.
Journal of Theoretical Politics – SAGE
Published: Jan 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.