Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland

Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland Earlier inversions of body wave delay‐time data recorded during the ICEMELT portable broadband experiment imaged a cylindrical plume‐like low‐velocity anomaly extending to at least 400 km depth beneath Iceland, but the depth extent of the anomaly resolvable by tomography has recently been called into question. We have performed several additional resolution tests to evaluate the depth resolution of tomographic models of the Icelandic upper mantle. The distribution of paths of body waves recorded by ICEMELT can distinguish among three different types of models: (a) a wide and shallow anomaly, (b) a narrow and deep anomaly, and (c) a narrow and shallow anomaly. While tomographic models contain an element of nonuniqueness, these tests illustrate that the depth resolution of passive seismic experiments spanning subaerial Iceland is adequate for distinguishing among alternative geodynamic models. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Geophysical Research Letters Wiley

Assessing the depth resolution of tomographic models of upper mantle structure beneath Iceland

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/assessing-the-depth-resolution-of-tomographic-models-of-upper-mantle-NW205qpHe7

References (20)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2002 by the American Geophysical Union.
ISSN
0094-8276
eISSN
1944-8007
DOI
10.1029/2001GL013657
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Earlier inversions of body wave delay‐time data recorded during the ICEMELT portable broadband experiment imaged a cylindrical plume‐like low‐velocity anomaly extending to at least 400 km depth beneath Iceland, but the depth extent of the anomaly resolvable by tomography has recently been called into question. We have performed several additional resolution tests to evaluate the depth resolution of tomographic models of the Icelandic upper mantle. The distribution of paths of body waves recorded by ICEMELT can distinguish among three different types of models: (a) a wide and shallow anomaly, (b) a narrow and deep anomaly, and (c) a narrow and shallow anomaly. While tomographic models contain an element of nonuniqueness, these tests illustrate that the depth resolution of passive seismic experiments spanning subaerial Iceland is adequate for distinguishing among alternative geodynamic models.

Journal

Geophysical Research LettersWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2002

There are no references for this article.