Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. Stigbrand (2017)
Retraction Note to multiple articles in Tumor BiologyTumor Biology
(2017)
A new record: Major publisher retracting more than 100 studies from cancer journal over fake peer reviews. Retraction Watch
M. Ribeiro, S. Vasconcelos (2018)
Retractions covered by Retraction Watch in the 2013–2015 period: prevalence for the most productive countriesScientometrics, 114
(2017)
A new record : Major publisher retracting more than 100 studies from cancer journal over fake peer reviews
D. Cyranoski (2017)
China cracks down on fake peer reviewsNature, 546
R. Rousseau (2018)
Institutional versus commercial email addresses: which one to use in your publications?
Xiaomei Liu, Xiaotian Chen (2018)
Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in ChinaJournal of Scholarly Publishing, 49
A. Bozzo, K. Bali, N. Evaniew, M. Ghert (2017)
Retractions in cancer research: a systematic surveyResearch Integrity and Peer Review, 2
M. Kozak, Olesia Iefremova, Jaroslaw Szkola, Daniel Sas (2015)
Do researchers provide public or institutional E‐mail accounts as correspondence E‐mails in scientific articles?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66
(2017)
A new record: Major publisher retracting
Raul Rodriguez-Esteban, D. Vishnyakova, Fabio Rinaldi (2019)
Revisiting the decay of scientific email addressesbioRxiv
(2017)
How to cite this article: Liu X, Chen X. Authors' noninstitutional emails and their correlation with retraction
Si Shen, R. Rousseau, Dongbo Wang (2018)
Do papers with an institutional e-mail address receive more citations than those with a non-institutional one?Scientometrics, 115
(2020)
The full-service paper mill and its Chinese customers
(2020)
The full-service paper mill and its Chinese customers. For Better Science
R. Vats, V. Sihag, Yeol Cho (2016)
Retraction NoteIranian Red Crescent Medical Journal, 18
We collected research articles from Retraction Watch database, Scopus, and a major retraction announcement by Springer, to identify emails used by authors. Authors' emails can be institutional emails and noninstitutional emails. Data suggest that retracted articles are more likely to use noninstitutional emails, but it is difficult to generalize. The study put some focus on authors from China.
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology – Wiley
Published: Apr 1, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.