Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
RG Langley, BE Elewski, M Lebwohl, K Reich, CE Griffiths, K Papp (2014)
Secukinumab in plaque psoriasis ?results of two phase 3 trials, 371
G Damiani, A Pacifico, F Russo, PDM Pigatto, NL Bragazzi, C Bonifati (2019)
Use of Secukinumab in a cohort of erythrodermic psoriasic patients: a pilot study, 8
HJ Weng, TS Wang, TF Tsai (2018)
Clinical experience of erythrodermic psoriasis: a case series, 178
C Mugheddu, L Atzori, A Lappi, M Pau, S Murgia, F Rongioletti (2017)
Successful secukinumab treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis and erythrodermic psoriasis, 31
A Mateu‐Puchades, S Santos‐Alarcon, A Martorell‐Calatayud (2018)
Erythrodermic psoriasis and secukinumab: our clinical experience, 31
LC Liu, XH Jin, CL Sun, JX Xia (2021)
Two cases of refractory erythrodermic psoriasis effectively treated with secukinumab and a review of the literature, 34
Dear Editor,Erythrodermic psoriasis (EP) is a rare and severe clinical form of psoriasis. Due to its low incidence, treatment is not standardized. Secukinumab (SEC) is an anti‐interleukin‐17A monoclonal antibody approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis.1 However, there are only few reports, including small case series, on its use for EP treatment in daily practice.2–5We designed a retrospective, observational, non‐controlled, multicentre cohort study of patients with EP treated with SEC in daily practice conditions conducted between December 2015 and July 2020. Dermatologists from one Portuguese and six Spanish hospitals participated in this study. Inclusion criteria were (1) adults diagnosed of EP (involvement of >80% of body surface area) treated with SEC in a daily practice setting; (2) initial standard dose regimen of SEK; (3) follow‐up for at least 3 months. Effectiveness (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, PASI) and quality of life (Dermatology Life Quality Index, DLQI) were evaluated through both. As observed and last observation carried forward (LOCF) analyses.Sixteen patients were included in the study. Baseline characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Five (31.2%) and 7 (43.7%) patients were naïve to conventional and biologic systemic therapy, respectively. Mean PASI, absolute and relative PASI, DLQI and Physician Global assessment
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2023
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.