Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Janette Schult, M. Steffens (2013)
Tuned for the future: Intentions are only accessible when a retrieval opportunity is nearMemory & Cognition, 41
Ji Lee, M. McDaniel (2012)
Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrievalMemory & Cognition, 41
M. McDaniel, Melissa Guynn, G. Einstein, Jennifer Breneiser (2004)
Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 30 3
Suzanna Penningroth, P. Graf, J. Gray (2012)
The Effect of a Working Memory Load on the Intention-Superiority Effect: Examining Three Features of AutomaticityApplied Cognitive Psychology, 26
A. Hayes (2013)
Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach
JA Ellis (1996)
Prospective memory: Theory and application
Jayne Freeman, J. Ellis (2003)
Aging and the Accessibility of Performed and To-Be-Performed ActionsAging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 10
Melissa Guynn, H. Zimmer, R. Cohen (2001)
Memory for Action: A Distinct Form of Episodic Memory?
M. Carroll, G. Mazzoni, Simone Andrews, P. Pocock (1999)
Monitoring the future: object and source memory for real and imagined eventsApplied Cognitive Psychology, 13
M. McDaniel, M. Scullin (2010)
Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory respondingMemory & Cognition, 38
R. Marsh, J. Hicks, E. Bryan (1999)
The activation of unrelated and canceled intentionsMemory & Cognition, 27
M. Steffens, Rul Stülpnagel, Janette Schult (2015)
Memory Recall After “Learning by Doing” and “Learning by Viewing”: Boundary Conditions of an Enactment BenefitFrontiers in Psychology, 6
Suzanna Penningroth (2005)
Free recall of everyday retrospective and prospective memories: The intention-superiority effect is moderated by action versus state orientation and by genderMemory, 13
P. Dockree, J. Ellis (2001)
Forming and canceling everyday intentions: Implications for prospective rememberingMemory & Cognition, 29
Susan Hornstein, N. Mulligan (2004)
Memory for actions: Enactment and source memoryPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11
P. Graf, B. Uttl (2001)
Prospective Memory: A New Focus for ResearchConsciousness and Cognition, 10
E. Altmann, J. Trafton (2002)
Memory for goals: an activation-based modelCogn. Sci., 26
Jayne Freeman, J. Ellis (2003)
The representation of delayed intentions: a prospective subject-performed task?Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 29 5
J. Förster, N. Liberman, E. Higgins (2005)
Accessibility from active and fulfilled goalsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41
Jayne Freeman, J. Ellis (2003)
The intention-superiority effect for naturally occurring activities: The role of intention accessibility in everyday prospective remembering in young and older adultsInternational Journal of Psychology, 38
Malcolm Rubel (1993)
Encoding informationData Based Advisor archive, 11
Sebastian Horn, U. Bayen, Rebekah Smith, C. Boywitt (2011)
The multinomial model of prospective memory: validity of ongoing-task parameters.Experimental psychology, 58 3
M. Garry, Charles Manning, E. Loftus, S. Sherman (1996)
Imagination inflation: Imagining a childhood event inflates confidence that it occurredPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3
S. Gilbert, Nicola Hadjipavlou, Matthieu Raoelison (2013)
Automaticity and Control in Prospective Memory: A Computational ModelPLoS ONE, 8
Suzanna Penningroth (2011)
When does the intention-superiority effect occur? Activation patterns before and after task completion, and moderating variablesJournal of Cognitive Psychology, 23
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Destination Memory Stop Me if I’ve Told You This Before
L. Kvavilashvili, Laura Fisher (2007)
Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 136 1
A. Kerckhove, Maggie Geuens, Iris Vermeir (2012)
Intention Superiority Perspectives on Preference-decision ConsistencyJournal of Business Research, 65
E. Schaefer, Maria Kozak, Kerry Sagness (1998)
The role of enactment in prospective rememberingMemory & Cognition, 26
R. Marsh, J. Hicks, M. Bink (1998)
Activation of Completed , Uncompleted , and Partially Completed Intentions
R. Cohen, M. Peterson, Toni Mantini-Atkinson (1987)
Interevent differences in event memory: Why are some events more recallable than others?Memory & Cognition, 15
Alberto Manzi, G. Nigro (2008)
Long-term memory for performed and observed actions: Retrieval awareness and source monitoringMemory, 16
Janette Schult, M. Steffens (2011)
On the representation of intentions: Do personally relevant consequences determine activation?Memory & Cognition, 39
J Cohen (1977)
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
J. Engelkamp (1998)
Memory for actions
N Gopie, CM MacLeod (2009)
Destination memory: Stop me if I’ve told you this beforePsychological Science, 20
T. Goschke, J. Kuhl (1993)
Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 19
Rul Stülpnagel, Janette Schult, Claudia Richter, M. Steffens (2016)
Cognitive costs of encoding novel natural activities: Can “learning by doing” be distracting and deceptive?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69
J. Snodgrass, J. Corwin (1988)
Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 117 1
C. Lebiere, Frank Lee (2002)
Intention superiority effect: A context-switching accountCognitive Systems Research, 3
Nele Fischer, Janette Schult, M. Steffens (2015)
Source and destination memory in face-to-face interaction: A multinomial modeling approach.Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 21 2
Janette Schult, Rul Stülpnagel, M. Steffens (2014)
Enactment versus Observation: Item-Specific and Relational Processing in Goal-Directed Action Sequences (and Lists of Single Actions)PLoS ONE, 9
J. Meilán, J. Carro, J. Arana, Enrique Pérez (2011)
Intention superiority effect on implicit memory of shopping lists: Activation and inhibition processesMotivation and Emotion, 35
A. Koriat, H. Ben-Zur, A. Nussbaum (1990)
Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasksMemory & Cognition, 18
K Lewin (1926)
Vorsatz, wille und bedürfnis [Intention, will, and need]Psychological Research, 7
Antonina Pereira, J. Ellis, Jayne Freeman (2012)
The effects of age, enactment, and cue-action relatedness on memory for intentions in the Virtual Week taskAging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19
K. Lewin (1926)
Vorsatz, Wille und BedürfnisPsychologische Forschung, 7
F. Faul, E. Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, A. Buchner (2007)
G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciencesBehavior Research Methods, 39
R. Marsh, J. Hicks (1998)
Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memoryJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24
Veit Kubik, H. Söderlund, L. Nilsson, Fredrik Jönsson (2014)
Individual and combined effects of enactment and testing on memory for action phrases.Experimental psychology, 61 5
Antonina Pereira, J. Ellis, Jayne Freeman (2012)
Is prospective memory enhanced by cue-action semantic relatedness and enactment at encoding?Consciousness and Cognition, 21
J. Ellis (1996)
Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research.
The intention-superiority effect denotes faster response latencies to stimuli linked with a prospective memory task compared to stimuli linked with no prospective task or with a cancelled task. It is generally assumed that the increased accessibility of intention-related materials contributes to successful execution of prospective memory tasks at an appropriate opportunity. In two experiments we investigated the relationship between the intention-superiority effect and actual prospective memory performance under relatively realistic conditions. We also manipulated enactment versus observation encoding to further investigate the similarity in representations of enacted and to-be-enacted tasks. Additionally, Experiment 1 included a control condition to investigate the development of the intention-superiority effect over time. Participants were asked to perform prospective tasks at the end of the experiment to prepare the room for the next participant. They studied these preparatory tasks at the beginning of the experiment either by enacting them themselves or by observing the experimenter perform them. In Experiment 2, participants in a control condition did not intend to perform prospective tasks. We observed a smaller intention-superiority effect after enactment encoding than after observation encoding, but only if response latencies were assessed immediately before the prospective memory task. In addition, Experiment 2 suggested that the size of the intention-superiority effect is related to successful prospective memory performance, thus providing evidence for a functional relationship between accessibility and memory.
Memory & Cognition – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 15, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.