Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Schacter, W. Koutstaal, Marcia Johnson, M. Gross, K. Angell (1997)
False recollection induced by photographs: a comparison of older and younger adults.Psychology and aging, 12 2
L. Jacoby, Mark Dallas (1981)
On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 110 3
Gupta Gupta, Lord Lord (1998)
Product placement in movies: the effect of prominence and mode on recallJournal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 20
S. Law, Scott Hawkins, F. Craik (1998)
Repetition-Induced Belief in the Elderly: Rehabilitating Age-Related Memory DeficitsJournal of Consumer Research, 25
S. Holden, M. Vanhuele (1999)
Know the name, forget the exposure: Brand familiarity versus memory of exposure contextPsychology & Marketing, 16
Laurie Babin, S. Carder (1996)
Viewers' Recognition of Brands Placed Within a FilmInternational Journal of Advertising, 15
Wells Wells (1996)
TV's subtle sellUSA Today
Marcia Johnson, M. Foley, Aurora Suengas, C. Raye (1988)
Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 117 4
(1983)
If the question is copy testing, the answer is...“Not recall.
Pola Gupta, Kenneth Lord (1998)
Product Placement in Movies: The Effect of Prominence and Mode on Audience RecallJournal of current issues and research in advertising, 20
Seinfeld gives mixed signs. USA Today
Scott Hawkins, Stephen Hoch (1992)
Low-Involvement Learning: Memory without EvaluationJournal of Consumer Research, 19
H. Krishnan, C. Trappey (1999)
Nonconscious memory processes in marketing: A historical perspective and future directionsPsychology & Marketing, 16
(1994)
A review and investigation into the effectiveness of product placements in films
A. d’Astous, F. Chartier (2000)
A Study of Factors Affecting Consumer Evaluations and Memory of Product Placements in MoviesJournal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 22
(1998)
Making your mark in movies and TV
D. Schacter (1987)
Implicit memory: History and current status.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 13
Stewart Shapiro, D. Macinnis, S. Heckler (1997)
The Effects of Incidental Ad Exposure on the Formation of Consideration SetsJournal of Consumer Research, 24
H. Krishnan, Dipankar Chakravarti (1999)
Memory Measures for Pretesting Advertisements: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and a Diagnostic TemplateJournal of Consumer Psychology, 8
Plugging away in Hollywood
Laurie Babin (1996)
Advertising via the Box OfficeJournal of Promotion Management, 3
(1999)
Response to brand placement : The effects of context and placement characteristics
Strauss Strauss (1999)
Seinfeld gives mixed signsUSA Today
G. Ye, W. Raaij (1997)
What inhibits the mere-exposure effect: Recollection or familiarity?Journal of Economic Psychology, 18
(1986)
Mental representativeness: A dual coding approach
S. Anderson, M. Conway (1993)
Investigating the structure of autobiographical memories.
J. Wells (1996)
Binding in the growth hormone receptor complex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93 1
(1994)
Effects of brand placements in motion pictures
(1994)
Brand recall for product placements in motion pictures : A memory - based perspective
Chris Janiszewski (1993)
Preattentive Mere Exposure EffectsJournal of Consumer Research, 20
Surendra Singh, M. Rothschild (1983)
Recognition as a Measure of Learning from Television CommercialsJournal of Marketing Research, 20
(1995)
Brand placements in feature films: The practitioners’ view
P. Graf, G. Mandler (1984)
Activation makes words more accessible, but not necessarily more retrievable.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23
H. Krishnan, Stewart Shapiro (1996)
Comparing implicit and explicit memory for brand names from advertisements
TV's subtle sell. USA Today
Product placement in TV shows is becoming increasingly common, yet little is known about its effectiveness nor even how to define and measure such effectiveness. This research examined the effectiveness of product placement with the use of two different types of measures: explicit measures that tap memory directly (with the use of a recognition and recall task), and an implicit measure that measures the effect of exposure on product choice indirectly. It was hypothesized that the ability of product placement to enhance memory and choice may be mediated by distinct mechanisms. The results showed an overall enhancement in product recall, recognition, and choice due to placement. Further, although products central to the plot were remembered and recalled more than products placed more subtly, no reliable effect of centrality of placement was observed on the choice measure. This dissociation also occurred with modality of placement—where seen‐only products most influenced choice but were least recalled. The present data conform to theories of memory, which predict that performance on explicit memory task can be dissociated or uncorrelated with performance on implicit performance or choice. This finding has significant implications for how product placements are designed and how their efficacy evaluated. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Psychology & Marketing – Wiley
Published: Dec 1, 2000
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.