Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Astin (1962)
SELECTION 11 – An Empirical Characterization of Higher Educational Institutions*Journal of Educational Psychology, 53
L. D. Patterson (1971)
Consortium Directory
J. D. Finn (1968)
Multivariance ... univariate and multivariate analysis of variance, covariance, and regression: a Fortran IV program
A. Astin (1965)
Who goes where to college
N. Cole, J. Cole (1970)
An Analysis of Spatial Configuration and its Application to Research in Higher Education.
In order to plan appropriate cooperative programs for particular higher education consortia, it is necessary to identify the characteristics of these organizations. The spatial configuration technique was used to illustrate the impact of eleven variables of the member institutions in differentiating among four consortia. Six of the variables — Control, Highest Degree Awarded, Percentage of Males, Math SAT Scores, Conventional Orientation, Scientific Orientation, and Endowment — were found to be significant in differentiating among the consortia. It was concluded that the spatial configuration technique was an effective way of visually comparing those consortia composed of member institutions, which as groups had similar and dissimilar characteristics.
Research in Higher Education – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 30, 2004
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.