Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Goss, R. Johnston, F. Dunn (1978)
Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64 2
J Haybittle (1991)
Curability of breast cancer.British medical bulletin, 47 2
Ann Scherzinger, Robert Belgam, P. Carson, Charles Meyer, Jeffrey Sutherland, F. Bookstein, Terry Silver (1989)
Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 15 1
(1983)
Ultrasonic Propagation Properties of the Breast, in Ultrasonic Examination of the Breast
L. Breiman, J. Friedman, R. Olshen, C. Stone (1984)
Classification and Regression TreesBiometrics, 40
F. D'Astous, F. Foster (1986)
Frequency dependence of ultrasound attenuation and backscatter in breast tissue.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 12 10
L. Landini, R. Sarnelli, M. Salvadori, F. Squartini (1987)
Orientation and frequency dependence of backscatter coefficient in normal and pathological breast tissues.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 13 2
L. Landini, R. Sarnelli, F. Squartini (1985)
Frequency-dependent attenuation in breast tissue characterization.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 11 4
A. Harper, E. Kelly-Fry, J. Noe (1981)
Ultrasound breast imaging-the method of choice for examining the young patient.Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 7 3
L. Busse, J. Miller (1981)
Detection of spatially nonuniform ultrasonic radiation with phase sensitive (piezoelectric) and phase insensitive (acoustoelectric) receiversJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70
R. Chivers, R. Parry (1978)
Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in mammalian tissues.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 63 3
J. Schreiman, J. Gisvold, J. Greenleaf, R. Bahn (1984)
Ultrasound transmission computed tomography of the breast.Radiology, 150 2
L. Busse, J. Miller (1981)
Response characteristics of a finite aperture, phase insensitive ultrasonic receiver based upon the acoustoelectric effectJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 70
J. Greenleaf, R. Bahn (1981)
Clinical Imaging with Transmissive Ultrasonic Computerized TomographyIEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BME-28
Toshiji Kobayashi (1978)
Clinical Ultrasound of the Breast
C. Cole‐Beuglet, B. Goldberg, A. Kurtz, C. Rubin, A. Patchefsky, G. Shaber (1981)
Ultrasound mammography: a comparison with radiographic mammography.Radiology, 139 3
Marcel Arditi, P. Edmonds, J. Jensen, C. Mortensen, W. Ross, P. Schattner, D. Stephens, W. Vinzant (1991)
Apparatus for ultrasound tissue characterization of excised specimens.Ultrasonic imaging, 13 3
J. Heyman, J. Cantrell (1977)
Application of an Ultrasonic Phase Insensitive Receiver to Material Measurements
C. Calderon, D. Vilkomerson, D. Vilkomerson, R. Mezrich, Etzold Kf, B. Kingsley, M. Haskin (1976)
Differences in the attenuation of ultrasound by normal, benign, and malignant breast tissueJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 4
P. Harper, E. Kelly-Fry (1980)
Ultrasound visualization of the breast in symptomatic patients.Radiology, 137 2
P. Carson, C. Meyer, A. Scherzinger, T. Oughton (1981)
Breast imaging in coronal planes with simultaneous pulse echo and transmission ultrasound.Science, 214 4525
P. Strax (1980)
Strategy (motivation) for detection of early breast cancerCancer, 46
J. Heyman (1978)
Phase insensitive acoustoelectric transducerJournal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64
Results of measurements of ultrasound speed and absorption coefficients in the range 3 to 8 MHz in breast tissues at 37 C are reported and analyzed in attempts to identify a set of ultrasound parameters capable of discriminating normal, benign, and malignant tissues. We analyzed 118 tissue regions, comprising 47 normal, 55 benign, and 16 malignant by straight-line fitting of frequency dependence of attenuation. Data for ten additional regions, for a total of 128, became available and were added to the cohort when we subsequently fitted quadratic curves. Sound speed consistently emerged as the variable with greatest discriminating power, particularly for separating normal from benign and malignant tissue. Great difficulty was encountered in discriminating benign from malignant, even when the jackknife technique was used. More success was found with classification and regression trees (CART), although results were sensitive to assigned misclassification costs. Best results from straight-line fits were obtained when discriminating malignant from combined normal/benign data after randomly assigning 75 percent of the data to the learning set and 25 percent to the test set. Then, 23 out of 25 normal/benign and 4 out of 4 malignant cases in the test set were correctly classified. With quadratic fitting, best results were obtained in the three-class case — the false positive rate for malignancy was reduced to zero in the learning (0/31) and test (0/10) sets. Nevertheless, the false negative rate increased to 13 out of 31 (42 percent) in the learning set, while attaining zero (0/4) in the test set.
Ultrasonic Imaging – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 1991
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.