T. DeMaio (1980)
Refusals: Who, Where and WhyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 44
H. Schuman, J. Converse (1971)
THE EFFECTS OF BLACK AND WHITE INTERVIEWERS ON BLACK RESPONSES IN 1968Public Opinion Quarterly, 35
N. Schaeffer (1980)
Evaluating Race-of-Interviewer Effects In a National SurveySociological Methods & Research, 8
I. Reiss (1968)
The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness
Ronald Rapoport (1985)
Like Mother, Like Daughter: Intergenerational Transmission of DK Response RatesPublic Opinion Quarterly, 49
P. Fishman (1978)
Interaction: The Work Women DoSocial Problems, 25
B. Anderson, B. Silver, P. Abramson (1988)
THE EFFECTS OF RACE OF THE INTERVIEWER ON MEASURES OF ELECTORAL PARTICIPATION BY BLACKS IN SRC NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIESPublic Opinion Quarterly, 52
M. Wiley, D. Woolley (1988)
INTERRUPTIONS AMONG EQUALS:Gender & Society, 2
Ronald Rapoport (1982)
Sex Differences in Attitude Expression: A Generational ExplanationPublic Opinion Quarterly, 46
J. Landis, D. Sullivan, J. Sheley (1973)
Feminist Attitudes as Related to Sex of the InterviewerSociological Perspectives, 16
R. Groves, N. Fultz (1985)
Gender Effects among Telephone Interviewers in a Survey of Economic AttitudesSociological Methods & Research, 14
D. Spender (1980)
Man Made Language
Lindsay Paterson, R. Groves (1991)
Survey Errors and Survey Costs.Biometrics, 48
Elizabeth Aries (1976)
Interaction Patterns and Themes of Male, Female, and Mixed GroupsSmall Group Research, 7
W. Johnson, J. Delamater (1976)
Response Effects in Sex SurveysPublic Opinion Quarterly, 40
Floyd Fowler (1984)
Survey Research Methods
D. Katz (1942)
DO INTERVIEWERS BIAS POLL RESULTSPublic Opinion Quarterly, 6
L. Lueptow, Susan Moser, B. Pendleton (1990)
Gender and response effects in telephone interviews about gender characteristicsSex Roles, 22
B. Anderson, B. Silver, P. Abramson (1988)
THE EFFECTS OF THE RACE OF THE INTERVIEWER ON RACE-RELATED ATTITUDES OF BLACK RESPONDENTS IN SRC/CPS NATIONAL ELECTION STUDIESPublic Opinion Quarterly, 52
D. Tannen (1990)
You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. morrow
J. Spencer, K. Drass (1989)
The Transformation of Gender into Conversational Advantage: A Symbolic Interactionist ApproachSociological Quarterly, 30
John Galla, J. Frisone, L. Jeffrey, E. Gaer (1981)
Effect of Experimenter's Gender on Responses to a Sex-Role Attitude QuestionnairePsychological Reports, 49
Abstract This research addresses the effects of interviewer gender on responses to a broad array of gender-related survey questions, using data from a probability sample of adults in the United States. We focus on whether gender-of-interviewer effects are evident, whether they vary by respondent gender, and whether they vary across several attitudinal domains relevant to gender inequality. While many items do not show statistically significant gender-of-interviewer effects, we document significant effects across a variety of items. When such effects are evident, they tend to involve both male and female respondents expressing more egalitarian gender-related attitudes or greater criticism of existing gender inequalities to female interviewers. Male respondents offer significantly different responses to male and female interviewers on questions dealing with gender inequality in employment. For female respondents, interviewer-gender effects are evident for items addressing gender-related collective action, policy, and group interests. Using multivariate models that allow us to represent both respondent-level and interviewer-level variables, we find that interviewer-gender effects are statistically significant in most attitudinal domains but that the interaction between interviewer gender and respondent gender does not tend to be statistically significant. We consider the implications of these findings both for understanding the survey process and for understanding gender relations more generally. This content is only available as a PDF. © 1993, the American Association for Public Opinion Research
Public Opinion Quarterly – Oxford University Press
Published: Jan 1, 1993
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.