Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities

The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities Abstract A 1980 study using the Delphi technique identified field instruction issues and research priorities. In this article, the author reports the findings of a study undertaken to determine if the issues and priorities have changed in the past decade. Twelve national experts reached a consensus on 29 of 61 statements/issues and on three research priorities for the next decade. As in 1980, the study participants viewed the Delphi technique as having strength in gaining consensus, allowing dialogue between geographically separated experts, and serving as an effective means of learning for participants. The prioritized research agenda developed by the experts in 1991 includes the need for empirical analysis of outcomes related to field education; models to ensure quality of field instruction; and processes to help field instructors assist students, especially in integrating classroom and field instruction. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Social Work Education Taylor & Francis

The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities

Journal of Social Work Education , Volume 30 (1): 15 – Jan 1, 1994

The Delphi Study in Field Instruction Revisited: Expert Consensus on Issues and Research Priorities

Journal of Social Work Education , Volume 30 (1): 15 – Jan 1, 1994

Abstract

Abstract A 1980 study using the Delphi technique identified field instruction issues and research priorities. In this article, the author reports the findings of a study undertaken to determine if the issues and priorities have changed in the past decade. Twelve national experts reached a consensus on 29 of 61 statements/issues and on three research priorities for the next decade. As in 1980, the study participants viewed the Delphi technique as having strength in gaining consensus, allowing dialogue between geographically separated experts, and serving as an effective means of learning for participants. The prioritized research agenda developed by the experts in 1991 includes the need for empirical analysis of outcomes related to field education; models to ensure quality of field instruction; and processes to help field instructors assist students, especially in integrating classroom and field instruction.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-delphi-study-in-field-instruction-revisited-expert-consensus-on-TG6JmVu3cd

References (19)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
ISSN
2163-5811
eISSN
1043-7797
DOI
10.1080/10437797.1994.10672215
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract A 1980 study using the Delphi technique identified field instruction issues and research priorities. In this article, the author reports the findings of a study undertaken to determine if the issues and priorities have changed in the past decade. Twelve national experts reached a consensus on 29 of 61 statements/issues and on three research priorities for the next decade. As in 1980, the study participants viewed the Delphi technique as having strength in gaining consensus, allowing dialogue between geographically separated experts, and serving as an effective means of learning for participants. The prioritized research agenda developed by the experts in 1991 includes the need for empirical analysis of outcomes related to field education; models to ensure quality of field instruction; and processes to help field instructors assist students, especially in integrating classroom and field instruction.

Journal

Journal of Social Work EducationTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 1994

There are no references for this article.