Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Osdol, G. Gulick, D. Johnson (2008)
The effects of a token reinforcement system on arithmetic achievement and short-term retention by educable mentally retarded students in a public school setting.Journal of mental deficiency research, 17 3
(1972)
Mass Media and the General Election Process: Evidence and Speculation
C. Park (1976)
The Effect of Individual and Situation-Related Factors on Consumer Selection of Judgmental ModelsJournal of Marketing Research, 13
P. Everett, S. Hayward, A. Meyers (1974)
The effects of a token reinforcement procedure on bus ridership.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 7 1
(1978)
A Paradigm for Research on Consumer Involvement
J. Payne (1976)
Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis☆Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16
R. Cialdini, R. Petty, J. Cacioppo (1981)
Attitude and Attitude ChangeAnnual Review of Psychology, 32
H. Rachlin (1970)
Introduction to modern behaviorism
Lawrence Bowen, S. Chaffee (1974)
Product Involvement and Pertinent Advertising AppealsJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 51
A. Campbell (1968)
Elections and the Political Order
(1966)
The Responsible Electorate
M. Rothschild, M. Ray (1974)
Involvement and Political Advertising EffectCommunication Research, 1
H. Krugman (1965)
THE IMPACT OF TELEVISION ADVERTISING: LEARNING WITHOUT INVOLVEMENTPublic Opinion Quarterly, 29
M. Ray (1973)
Marketing communication and the hierarchy-of-effects
R. Powers, J. Osborne, E. Anderson (1973)
Positive reinforcement of litter removal in the natural environment.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 6 4
(1976)
The Effect oflndividual and Situation-Related
C. Sherif, M. Sherif (1967)
Attitude, ego-involvement, and change
R. Gorsuch, M. Rokeach (1968)
Beliefs, attitudes, and values
B. Deslauriers, P. Everett (1977)
EFFECTS OF INTERMITTENT AND CONTINUOUS TOKEN REINFORCEMENT ON BUS RIDERSHIPJournal of Applied Psychology, 62
R. Rhine, L. Severance (1970)
Ego-involvement, discrepancy, source credibility, and attitude change.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16
Nancy Hupfer, D. Gardner (1971)
Differential involvement with products and issues : an exploratory study / BEBR No. 21
George Day, Gerald Eskin, David Montgomery, J. Carey, Steven CLlCQUE, Barbara Leighton, Frank Milton (1976)
A Test of Positive Reinforcement of CustomersJournal of Marketing, 40
R. Kohlenberg, T. Phillips (1973)
Reinforcement and rate of litter depositing.Journal of applied behavior analysis, 6 3
P. Kotler (1971)
Marketing Decision Making: A Model-building Approach
Kristian Palda (1975)
The Effect of Expenditure on Political SuccessThe Journal of Law and Economics, 18
H. Mendelsohn (1973)
SOME REASONS WHY INFORMATION CAMPAIGNS CAN SUCCEEDPublic Opinion Quarterly, 37
G. Lagneau (1969)
Blumler J. G., McQuail D., Television and politics : its uses and influence.Revue Francaise De Sociologie, 10
M. Rothschild (1978)
Political Advertising: A Neglected Policy Issue in MarketingJournal of Marketing Research, 15
T. Patterson, R. Mcclure (1976)
Television and the Less-Interested Voter: The Costs of an Informed ElectorateThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 425
H. Johnson, John Scileppi (1969)
Effects of ego-involvement conditions on attitude change to high and low credibility communicators.Journal of personality and social psychology, 13 1
R. Rhine, William Polowniak (1971)
Attitude change, commitment, and ego involvement.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 19
R. Apsler, D. Sears (1968)
Warning, personal involvement, and attitude change.Journal of personality and social psychology, 9 2
P. Lazarsfeld, B. Berelson, Hazel Gaudet (1945)
The people's choice., 6
D. Bem (1970)
Beliefs Attitudes and Human Affairs
Hugh Brooks, G. Wiebe (1951)
Merchandising Commodities and Citizenship on TelevisionPublic Opinion Quarterly, 15
In order to effectively use marketing communications techniques for public and nonprofit sector problems, one must consider the extreme differences between these and private sector problems. Major differences may include the presence of very high or very low involvement, issues offering few perceivable benefits to individuals, and high monetary prices. A framework for considering very high and very low involvement cases is considered and options for marketers are presented.
Journal of Marketing – SAGE
Published: Mar 1, 1979
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.