Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Lars Fuglsang, A. Nordli (2018)
On Service Innovation as an Interactive Process: A Case Study of the Engagement with Innovation of a Tourism ServiceSocial Sciences
Lars Fuglsang, J. Mattsson (2009)
An integrative model of care ethics in public innovationThe Service Industries Journal, 29
Elsa Dessaigne, C. Pardo (2020)
The network orchestrator as steward: Strengthening norms as an orchestration practiceIndustrial Marketing Management, 91
C. Dhanaraj, Arvind Parkhe (2006)
Orchestrating Innovation NetworksAcademy of Management Review, 31
S. Borgatti, Ajay Mehra, Daniel Brass, G. Labianca (2009)
Network Analysis in the Social SciencesScience, 323
N. Clarke (2006)
The relationships between network commitment, its antecedents and network performanceManagement Decision, 44
(2005)
Oslo Manual
Dennis Gioia, Kevin Corley, A. Hamilton (2013)
Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive ResearchOrganizational Research Methods, 16
Raymond Paquin, Jennifer Howard-Grenville (2013)
Blind Dates and Arranged Marriages: Longitudinal Processes of Network OrchestrationOrganization Studies, 34
E. Liguori, Thomas Pittz (2020)
Strategies for small business: Surviving and thriving in the era of COVID-19Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1
N. Wickramasinghe (2011)
Knowledge Creation
Anne-Mette Hjalager (2010)
A review of innovation research in tourismTourism Management, 31
Luke Pittaway, M. Robertson, Kamal Munir, D. Denyer, Andy Neely (2004)
Networking and Innovation: A Systematic Review of the EvidenceEconomics of Networks
A. Gausdal, E. Nilsen (2011)
Orchestrating Innovative SME Networks. The Case of “HealthInnovation”Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 2
M. Batterink, E. Wubben, L. Klerkx, S. Omta (2010)
Orchestrating innovation networks: The case of innovation brokers in the agri-food sectorEntrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22
Wouter Bockhaven, P. Matthyssens (2017)
Mobilizing a network to develop a field: Enriching the business actor's mobilization analysis toolkitIndustrial Marketing Management, 67
Sarah Hezlett, Sharon Gibson (2005)
Mentoring and Human Resource Development: Where We Are and Where We Need to GoAdvances in Developing Human Resources, 7
S. Newell, M. Robertson, H. Scarbrough, J. Swan (2009)
Managing Knowledge Work and Innovation
N. Chalofsky, T. Rocco, M. Morris (2014)
Handbook of Human Resource Development: CHALOFSKY: HANDBOOK OF HUMAN RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT
P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Satu Nätti (2017)
Orchestrator types, roles and capabilities – A framework for innovation networksIndustrial Marketing Management
F. Lindberg, A. Hansen, D. Eide (2014)
A Multirelational Approach for Understanding Consumer Experiences Within TourismJournal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 23
H. Chesbrough, A. Minin (2011)
Open Services Innovation: Competere in una nuova era
Olli Lagerspetz (1998)
The Ethical Demand
Rémy Magnier-Watanabe, Caroline Benton (2017)
Management innovation and firm performance: the mediating effects of tacit and explicit knowledgeKnowledge Management Research & Practice, 15
A. Benson, D. Blackman (2011)
To Distribute Leadership or Not? A Lesson from the Islands
K. Eisenhardt, Melissa Graebner (2007)
Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And ChallengesAcademy of Management Journal, 50
F. Gallouj, L. Rubalcaba, P. Windrum (2013)
Public-Private Innovation Networks in Services
Ingrid Kofler, A. Marcher (2018)
Inter-organizational networks of small and medium-sized enterprises (SME) in the field of innovation: a case study of South TyrolJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 30
G. Krogh (1998)
Care in Knowledge CreationCalifornia Management Review, 40
Daniel Schepis, S. Purchase, Bella Butler (2021)
Facilitating open innovation processes through network orchestration mechanismsIndustrial Marketing Management, 93
V. Ratten (2020)
Coronavirus (covid-19) and entrepreneurship: changing life and work landscapeJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32
Charlotte Reypens, A. Lievens, V. Blazevic (2019)
Hybrid Orchestration in Multi-stakeholder Innovation Networks: Practices of mobilizing multiple, diverse stakeholders across organizational boundariesOrganization Studies, 42
K. Eisenhardt (1989)
Building theories from case study researchSTUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
E. Wenger (2000)
Communities of Practice and Social Learning SystemsOrganization, 7
D. Orton, K. Weick, J. Orton, K. Weick (1990)
Loosely Coupled Systems: A ReconceptualizationAcademy of Management Review, 15
K. Möller, S. Svahn (2009)
How to influence the birth of new business fields — Network perspectiveIndustrial Marketing Management, 38
Linda Rhoades, R. Eisenberger (2002)
Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature.The Journal of applied psychology, 87 4
Nina Hasche, Linda Höglund, Gabriel Linton (2019)
Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: creating value within a Swedish regional innovation systemJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 32
M. Pikkarainen, M. Ervasti, P. Hurmelinna-Laukkanen, Satu Nätti (2017)
Orchestration Roles to Facilitate Networked Innovation in a Healthcare EcosystemTechnology Innovation Management Review, 7
Gordon Müller-Seitz (2011)
Leadership in Interorganizational Networks: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Future ResearchInternational Strategy & Policy eJournal
Abstract Although MSMEs are expected to benefit the most from participating in collaborative innovation, they often struggle to gain these benefits. This study contributes knowledge about how to reduce the barriers. Three regional innovation networks were studied primarily through semi-structured interviews. They were formal networks, and the tourism sector was the main industry. Data analysis followed the grounded theory. A hidden but essential practice of network orchestration is constructed, i.e. ‘member-care leadership.’ Involving the subpractices of empathizing, engaging, and supervising single members’ to increase value from participating in the network. In particular, member-care leadership enables MSMEs to prioritize and carry out network activities and innovation at and between network gatherings. The care subpractices are interdependent, dynamic, and relational. The practice triggered learning and innovation within the enterprises and increased the enterprises ‘of-gathering activity’, knowledge sharing, and performance at the network level. This suggests that innovation network literature should take a humanistic and relational approach to orchestration. The study also provides an understanding of how network-driven innovation involves multileveled and dynamic processes, with orchestration and activity at the enterprise and network levels and between these levels. A policy implication is that member-care leadership should be acknowledged and allocated human and economic resources.
Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship – Taylor & Francis
Published: Sep 2, 2024
Keywords: SME; network-driven innovation; orchestration; care leadership; inter-organizational networks; PME; innovation entraînée par les réseaux; orchestration; leadership en matière de soins; réseaux inter-organisationnels
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.