Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Event-Based Prospective Memory and Executive Control of Working Memory

Event-Based Prospective Memory and Executive Control of Working Memory In 5 experiments, the character of concurrent cognitiveprocessing was manipulated during an event-based prospective memorytask. High- and low-load conditions that differed only in thedifficulty of the concurrent task were tested in each experiment. InExperiments 1 and 2, attention-demanding tasks from the literatureon executive control produced decrements in prospective memory. InExperiment 3, attention was divided by different loads ofarticulatory suppression that did not ultimately lead to decrementsin prospective memory. A high-load manipulation of a visuospatialtask requiring performance monitoring resulted in worse prospectivememory in Experiment 4, whereas in Experiment 5 a visuospatial taskwith little monitoring did not. Results are discussed in terms ofexecutive functions, such as planning and monitoring, that appear tobe critical to successful event-based prospective memory. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition American Psychological Association

Event-Based Prospective Memory and Executive Control of Working Memory

Loading next page...
 
/lp/american-psychological-association/event-based-prospective-memory-and-executive-control-of-working-memory-U9853IuZDU

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
American Psychological Association
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 American Psychological Association
ISSN
0278-7393
eISSN
1939-1285
DOI
10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.336
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In 5 experiments, the character of concurrent cognitiveprocessing was manipulated during an event-based prospective memorytask. High- and low-load conditions that differed only in thedifficulty of the concurrent task were tested in each experiment. InExperiments 1 and 2, attention-demanding tasks from the literatureon executive control produced decrements in prospective memory. InExperiment 3, attention was divided by different loads ofarticulatory suppression that did not ultimately lead to decrementsin prospective memory. A high-load manipulation of a visuospatialtask requiring performance monitoring resulted in worse prospectivememory in Experiment 4, whereas in Experiment 5 a visuospatial taskwith little monitoring did not. Results are discussed in terms ofexecutive functions, such as planning and monitoring, that appear tobe critical to successful event-based prospective memory.

Journal

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CognitionAmerican Psychological Association

Published: Mar 1, 1998

There are no references for this article.