Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
In 5 experiments, the character of concurrent cognitiveprocessing was manipulated during an event-based prospective memorytask. High- and low-load conditions that differed only in thedifficulty of the concurrent task were tested in each experiment. InExperiments 1 and 2, attention-demanding tasks from the literatureon executive control produced decrements in prospective memory. InExperiment 3, attention was divided by different loads ofarticulatory suppression that did not ultimately lead to decrementsin prospective memory. A high-load manipulation of a visuospatialtask requiring performance monitoring resulted in worse prospectivememory in Experiment 4, whereas in Experiment 5 a visuospatial taskwith little monitoring did not. Results are discussed in terms ofexecutive functions, such as planning and monitoring, that appear tobe critical to successful event-based prospective memory.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition – American Psychological Association
Published: Mar 1, 1998
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.