Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/sage/risk-assessment-instruments-in-clinical-practice-UooEcoO253
References (41)
-
Daniel Murrie, M. Boccaccini, Jeremy Johnson, Chelsea Janke (2008)
Does Interrater (Dis)agreement on Psychopathy Checklist Scores in Sexually Violent Predator Trials Suggest Partisan Allegiance in Forensic Evaluations?Law and Human Behavior, 32
-
R. Schneider (2009)
Commentary: evidence-based practice and forensic psychiatry.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 37 4
-
E. Elbogen, C. Mercado, M. Scalora, A. Tomkins (2002)
Perceived Relevance of Factors for Violence Risk Assessment: A Survey of CliniciansInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1
-
A. Crocker, G. Côté (2009)
Evolving systems of care: Individuals found not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder in custody of civil and forensic psychiatric servicesEuropean Psychiatry, 24
-
M. Boccaccini, Darrel Turner, Daniel Murrie (2008)
DO SOME EVALUATORS REPORT CONSISTENTLY HIGHER OR LOWER PCL-R SCORES THAN OTHERS? Findings From a Statewide Sample of Sexually Violent Predator EvaluationsPsychology, Public Policy and Law, 14
-
Shari McKee, G. Harris, M. Rice (2007)
Improving forensic tribunal decisions: the role of the clinician.Behavioral sciences & the law, 25 4
-
V. Vogel, C. Ruiter (2006)
Structured professional judgment of violence risk in forensic clinical practice: a prospective study into the predictive validity of the Dutch HCR-20Psychology Crime & Law, 12
-
M. Dolan, A. Khawaja (2004)
The HCR-20 and post-discharge outcome in male patients discharged from medium security in the UKAggressive Behavior, 30
-
N. Gray, John Taylor, R. Snowden (2008)
Predicting violent reconvictions using the HCR-20British Journal of Psychiatry, 192
-
Mats Dernevik, M. Grann, S. Johansson (2002)
Violent behaviour in forensic psychiatric patients: Risk assessment and different risk-management levels using the HCR-20Psychology, Crime & Law, 8
-
S. Strand, H. Belfrage, G. Fransson, S. Levander (1999)
Clinical and risk management factors in risk prediction of mentally disordered offenders‐more important than historical data?: A retrospective study of 40 mentally disordered offenders assessed with the HCR‐20 violence risk assessment schemeLegal and Criminological Psychology, 4
-
K. Douglas, J. Ogloff, Tonia Nicholls, I. Grant (1999)
Assessing risk for violence among psychiatric patients: the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme and the Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 67 6
-
G. Glancy, G. Chaimowitz (2005)
The Clinical Use of Risk AssessmentThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50
-
(1995)
The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version (PCL-SV) -
(2007)
Variables predicting structured and unstructured risk assessment ratings of violence -
Daniel Murrie, M. Boccaccini, Darrel Turner, Meredith Meeks, Carol Woods, Chriscelyn Tussey (2009)
Rater (dis)agreement on risk assessment measures in sexually violent predator proceedings: Evidence of adversarial allegiance in forensic evaluation?Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 15
-
K. Douglas, J. Ogloff, S. Hart (2003)
Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.Psychiatric services, 54 10
-
N. Gray, C. Hill, A. McGleish, D. Timmons, M. Macculloch, R. Snowden (2003)
Prediction of violence and self-harm in mentally disordered offenders: a prospective study of the efficacy of HCR-20, PCL-R, and psychiatric symptomatology.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 71 3
-
A. Crocker, E. Braithwaite, G. Côté, Tonia Nicholls, M. Seto (2011)
To Detain or to Release? Correlates of Dispositions for Individuals Declared Not Criminally Responsible on Account of Mental DisorderThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56
-
E. Elbogen, A. Tomkins, Antara Pothuloori, M. Scalora (2003)
Documentation of violence risk information in psychiatric hospital patient charts: an empirical examination.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 31 1
-
(2010)
The National Trajectory Study: examining the changing face of the forensic mental health population and services in Canada -
(2007)
Commission d’examen des troubles mentaux (CETM): Guide. Québec (QC): Québec Tad -
M. Norko, M. Baranoski (2005)
The State of Contemporary Risk Assessment ResearchThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50
-
J. Lani (2010)
Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) -
R. Borum (1996)
Improving the clinical practice of violence risk assessment. Technology, guidelines, and training.The American psychologist, 51 9
-
J. Hemphill, R. Hare, Stephen Wong (1998)
Psychopathy and recidivism: A reviewLegal and Criminological Psychology, 3
-
R. Hare (2006)
Psychopathy: a clinical and forensic overview.The Psychiatric clinics of North America, 29 3
-
M. Seto (2005)
Is more better? Combining actuarial risk scales to predict recidivism among adult sex offenders.Psychological assessment, 17 2
-
(1998)
Aggression in psychiatric patients using the HCR-20 to assess risk for violence in hospital and in the community -
K. Douglas, Melinda Yeomans, D. Boer (2005)
Comparative Validity Analysis of Multiple Measures of Violence Risk in a Sample of Criminal OffendersCriminal Justice and Behavior, 32
-
Shailesh Kumar, A. Simpson (2005)
Application of Risk Assessment for Violence Methods to General Adult Psychiatry: A Selective Literature ReviewAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 39
-
J. Landis, G. Koch (1977)
The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.Biometrics, 33 1
-
H. Bloom, C. Webster, S. Hucker, Karen Freitas (2005)
The Canadian Contribution to Violence Risk Assessment: History and Implications for Current Psychiatric PracticeThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 50
-
J. Monahan (1981)
Predicting Violent Behavior: An Assessment of Clinical Techniques -
L. O’Shea, G. Dickens (2014)
Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychological assessment, 26 3
-
K. Heilbrun (1998)
Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk.Psychiatric Services, 51
-
H. Belfrage, Ran Fransson, S. Strand (2000)
Prediction of violence using the HCR-20: a prospective study in two maximum-security correctional institutionsThe Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 11
-
K. Douglas, C. Webster (1999)
The HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment SchemeCriminal Justice and Behavior, 26
-
N. Hilton, Janet Simmons (2001)
The Influence of Actuarial Risk Assessment in Clinical Judgments and Tribunal Decisions about Mentally Disordered Offenders in Maximum SecurityLaw and Human Behavior, 25
-
A. Buchanan (2001)
HCR‐20. Assessing risk for violence, version 2. By C. Webster, K. Douglas, D. Eaves and S. Hart. Mental Health, Law and Policy Institute, British Columbia. 1997. 98 + vii ppCriminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 11
-
V. Quinsey, G. Harris, M. Rice, Catherine Cormier (2006)
Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk, 2nd ed.
- Publisher
- SAGE
- Copyright
- © 2012 Canadian Psychiatric Association
- ISSN
- 0706-7437
- eISSN
- 1497-0015
- DOI
- 10.1177/070674371205700407
- pmid
- 22480589
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Objective:To determine whether the items in one of the most widely validated instruments of violence risk assessment, the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20), are used in review board hearings to assess the risk of violence by people found Not Criminally Responsible on account of Mental Disorder (NCRMD).Method:This study was conducted from October 2004 to August 2006 in Quebec's sole forensic psychiatric hospital and 2 large civil psychiatric hospitals designated for the care of people declared NCRMD in the Montreal metropolitan area. The risk assessments presented by clinicians at annual review board hearings and the boards' rationale for the release or detention of people found NCRMD were contrasted with the risk assessments conducted by the research team using the HCR-20. The final sample was comprised of 96 men.Results:Very few of the risk factors identified by prior research (HCR-20 items) were mentioned in the hearing process, whether in clinical reports, discussions during the hearing, or in the disposition justification.Conclusions:The findings confirm that there remains a significant gap between research evidence and risk assessment practice.
Journal
Canadian Journal of Psychiatry – SAGE
Published: Apr 1, 2012