Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. P. Archdeacon, W. J. Remshardt (2012)
Observations of hatchery‐reared Rio Grande Silvery Minnow using a fishway, 32
T. P. Archdeacon, K. R. Henderson, T. J. Austring, R. L. Cook (2015)
Comparison of fish communities at random and nonrandom locations in a sand‐bed river, 35
R. K. Dudley, S. P. Platania (2007)
Flow regulation and fragmentation imperil pelagic‐spawning riverine fishes, 17
M. E. Brooks, K. Kristensen, K. J. Benthem, A. Magnusson, C. W. Berg, A. Nielsen, H. J. Skaug, M. Mächler, B. M. Bolker (2017)
glmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero‐inflated generalized linear mixed modeling, 9
J. E. Claussen, D. P. Philipp (2022)
Assessing the role of supplementation stocking: A perspective
P. Capdevila, I. Stott, M. Beger, R. Salguero‐Gómez (2020)
Towards a comparative framework of demographic resilience, 35
H. Araki, B. Cooper, M. S. Blouin (2007)
Genetic effects of captive breeding cause a rapid, cumulative fitness decline in the wild, 318
D. Alò, T. F. Turner (2005)
Effects of habitat fragmentation on effective population size in the endangered Rio Grande Silvery Minnow, 19
K. R. Bestgen, S. P. Platania (1991)
Status and conservation of the Rio Grande Silvery Minnow, Hybognathus amarus, 36
P. Capdevila, I. Stott, J. Cant, M. Berger, G. Rowlands, M. Grace, R. Salguero‐Gómez (2022)
Life history mediates the trade‐offs among different components of demographic resilience, 25
H. Araki, C. Schmid (2010)
Is hatchery stocking a help or harm?: Evidence, limitations and future directions in ecological and genetic surveys, 308
T. P. Archdeacon, J. K. Reale (2020)
No quarter: Lack of refuge during flow intermittency results in catastrophic mortality of an imperiled minnow, 65
K. R. Bestgen, S. P. Platania (1990)
Extirpation of Notropis simus simus (Cope) and Notropis orca Woolman (Pisces: Cyprinidae) from the Rio Grande in New Mexico, with notes on their life history, 6
T. P. Archdeacon (2022)
Rio Grande Silvery Minnow annual augmentation plan 2023–2028
J. L. Day, J. L. Jacobs, J. Rasmussen (2017)
Considerations for the propagation and conservation of endangered lake suckers of the western United States, 8
T. P. Archdeacon, J. K. Reale, E. J. Gonzales, J. D. Grant (2020)
Effects of seining effort and site length on variability of small‐bodied fish catch‐rates in a sand‐bed river, 36
D. E. Cowley (2006)
Strategies for ecological restoration of the middle Rio Grande in New Mexico and recovery of the endangered Rio Grande Silvery Minnow, 14
T. L. Blythe, J. C. Schmidt (2018)
Estimating the natural flow regime of rivers with long‐standing development: The northern branch of the Rio Grande, 54
P. J. Anders (1998)
Conservation aquaculture and endangered species: Can objective science prevail over risk anxiety?, 23
T. P. Archdeacon (2016)
Reduction in spring flow threatens Rio Grande Silvery Minnow: Trends in abundance during river intermittency, 145
C. S. Altenbach, R. K. Dudley, S. P. Platania (2000)
A new device for collecting drifting semibuoyant fish eggs, 129
INTRODUCTIONCaptive propagation can be an important tool for conservation and recovery of endangered freshwater fishes. Implementation often involves difficult and controversial decisions that require balancing the risks associated with small population sizes and the risks associated with introducing captive‐reared individuals into wild populations to achieve a demographic boost (Anders 1998; Wood et al. 2019; Claussen and Philipp 2022). Both augmentation (intended to increase the total number of fish) and supplementation (intended to increase future recruitment; sensu Claussen and Philipp 2022) are increasingly used to combat declining freshwater fish populations. Captive propagation can be used to preserve genetic diversity (Meffe 1987; Osborne et al. 2012); provide unique natural history, behavioral, or early life history observations (Platania and Altenbach 1998; Rakes et al. 1999; Ruble et al. 2019); stave off extinction (Paragamian and Beamesderfer 2004; Katz et al. 2013); or provide individuals for reintroduction efforts without harming wild source populations (Shute et al. 2005; Lamothe et al. 2021). Recently, conservation aquaculture programs focusing on maintaining “wildness” (e.g., Osborne et al. 2020) have been implemented to balance the potential negative effects of supplementation with hatchery fish against recovery goals in the face of rapidly declining diversity (Tickner et al. 2020).The Rio Grande Silvery (RGS) Minnow Hybognathus amarus is a small‐bodied, short‐lived minnow species. Historically widespread in the
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society – Oxford University Press
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: conservation hatchery; demographics; resilience; resistance; threatened and endangered species
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.