Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. Sutton, A. Barto (1981)
Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: expectation and prediction.Psychological review, 88 2
M. Zorzi, G. Houghton, B. Butterworth (1998)
The Development of Spelling-Sound Relationships in a Model of Phonological ReadingLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 13
M. Taft (1991)
Reading and the Mental Lexicon
M. Yap, D. Balota (2009)
Visual word recognition of multisyllabic wordsJournal of Memory and Language, 60
D. Rumelhart, James McClelland (1986)
Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition : Psychological and Biological Models
D. Rumelhart, James McClelland (1986)
Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations
Michael Hammond (1999)
The phonology of English : a prosodic optimality-theoretic approach
Tainturier Tainturier, Caramazza Caramazza (1996)
Double letters in graphemic representationsJournal of Memory and Language, 35
K. Rastle, M. Coltheart (2000)
Lexical and Nonlexical Print-to-Sound Translation of Disyllabic Words and NonwordsJournal of Memory and Language, 42
M. Tainturier, B. Rapp (2004)
Complex graphemes as functional spelling units: evidence from acquired dysgraphia.Neurocase, 10 2
C. Perry, J. Ziegler, M. Zorzi (2010)
Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the Connectionist Dual Process (CDP++) modelCognitive Psychology, 61
M. Kelly (2004)
Word Onset Patterns and Lexical Stress in English.Journal of Memory and Language, 50
C. Davis, J. Bowers (2006)
Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: evidence from orthographic similarity effects.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 32 3
M. Zorzi (2010)
The connectionist dual process (CDP) approach to modelling reading aloudEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22
M. Gluck, G. Bower (1988)
From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 117 3
D. Plaut (1999)
A connectionist approach to word reading and acquired dyslexia: extension to sequential processingCogn. Sci., 23
C. Perry (2013)
Graphemic parsing and the basic orthographic syllable structureLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 28
S. Andrews (2006)
From inkmarks to ideas : current issues in lexical processing
Manuel Perea, S. Lupker (2004)
Can CANISO activate CASINO? Transposed-letter similarity effects with nonadjacent letter positions ☆Journal of Memory and Language, 51
C. Perry, J. Zhuang (2005)
Prosody and lemma selectionMemory & Cognition, 33
K. Forster, J. Forster (2003)
DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracyBehavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35
D. MacKay (1972)
The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speechCognitive Psychology, 3
Perry Perry, Ziegler Ziegler, Zorzi Zorzi (2007)
Nested modeling and strong inference resting in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloudPsychological Review, 27
I. Stoianov, M. Zorzi (2012)
Emergence of a 'visual number sense' in hierarchical generative modelsNature Neuroscience, 15
D. Spieler, D. Balota (1997)
Bringing Computational Models of Word Naming Down to the Item LevelPsychological Science, 8
Mark Seidenberg, James McClelland (1989)
A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological review, 96 4
(2001)
DRC: A computational model
D. Share (1995)
Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading acquisitionCognition, 55
U. Goswami, J. Ziegler (2006)
A developmental perspective on the neural code for written wordsTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 10
T. Hall (2006)
English syllabification as the interaction of markedness constraintsStudia Linguistica, 60
(1960)
Adaptive switching circuits. In In Institute of Radio Engineers, Western Electronic Show and Convention Record, Part 4 (pp. 96–104)
Pablo Gómez, R. Ratcliff, Manuel Perea (2008)
The overlap model: a model of letter position coding.Psychological review, 115 3
Susan Bartlett, Grzegorz Kondrak, Colin Cherry (2008)
Automatic Syllabification with Structured SVMs for Letter-to-Phoneme Conversion
M. Zorzi, G. Houghton, B. Butterworth (1998)
Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24
M. Coltheart, K. Rastle, C. Perry, R. Langdon, J. Ziegler (2001)
DRC: a dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological review, 108 1
Appendix S2. Constructing the training databases
M. Cassar, R. Treiman (1997)
The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words.Journal of Educational Psychology, 89
G. Houghton, M. Zorzi (2003)
NORMAL AND IMPAIRED SPELLING IN A CONNECTIONIST DUAL-ROUTE ARCHITECTURECognitive Neuropsychology, 20
D. Balota, D. Spieler (1998)
The Utility of Item-Level Analyses in Model Evaluation: A Reply to Seidenberg and PlautPsychological Science, 9
John Anderson, Daniel Bothell, M. Byrne, Scott Douglass, C. Lebiere, Yulin Qin (2004)
An integrated theory of the mind.Psychological review, 111 4
E. Spinelli, S. Kandel, Helena Guerassimovitch, L. Ferrand (2012)
Graphemic cohesion effect in reading and writing complex graphemesLanguage and Cognitive Processes, 27
Y. Munakata (1998)
Infant perseveration and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the AB taskDevelopmental Science, 1
M. Cotelli, J. Abutalebi, M. Zorzi, S. Cappa (2003)
Vowels in the buffer: a case study of acquired dysgraphia with selective vowels substitutions. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20, 99-114
W. Levelt, A. Roelofs, A. Meyer (1999)
A theory of lexical access in speech productionBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 22
Jonathan Culpeper, D. Archer (2009)
The history of English spelling
D. Chateau, D. Jared (2003)
Spelling–sound consistency effects in disyllabic word namingJournal of Memory and Language, 48
F. Hutzler, J. Ziegler, C. Perry, H. Wimmer, M. Zorzi (2004)
Do current connectionist learning models account for reading development in different languages?Cognition, 91
R. Baayen, P. Milin, Dušica Đurđević, Peter Hendrix, M. Marelli (2011)
An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning.Psychological review, 118 3
S. Pacton, P. Perruchet, M. Fayol, Axel Cleeremans (2001)
Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 130 3
I. Leudar (1989)
James L. McClelland, David Rumelhart and the PDP Research Group, Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition . Vol. 1. Foundations . Vol. 2. Psychological and biological models . Cambridge MA: M.I.T. Press, 1987.Journal of Child Language, 16
R. Treiman, J. Mullennix, E. Daylene, Richmond-Welly, Joel Ager, S. Andrews, Linda Bartoll, Renee Dudzinski, I. Nimmo-Smith, D. Norris, K. Patterson, D. Pisoni, E. Strain, P. Wilson, Lin Zong, J. Bowey, Brett Kessler, Sandy Pollatsek, Mark Seidenberg (1995)
The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 124 2
C. Perry, J. Ziegler, M. Braun, M. Zorzi (2010)
Rules versus statistics in reading aloud: New evidence on an old debateEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22
C. Perry, J. Ziegler, M. Zorzi (2007)
Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: the CDP+ model of reading aloud.Psychological review, 114 2
M. Adams (1980)
What good is orthographic redundancy
A. Rey, J. Ziegler, A. Jacobs (2000)
Graphemes are perceptual reading unitsCognition, 75
D. Plaut, James McClelland, Mark Seidenberg, K. Patterson (1996)
Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological review, 103 1
Arciuli Arciuli, Cupples Cupples (2006)
The processing of lexical stress in word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlatesThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59
M. Tainturier, A. Caramazza (1996)
The status of double letters in Graphemic representationsJournal of Memory and Language, 35
M. Adams (1991)
Beginning To Read: Thinking and Learning about Print.Language, 67
R. Venezky (1967)
English Orthography: Its Graphical Structure and Its Relation to soundReading Research Quarterly, 2
J. Arciuli, L. Cupples (2006)
The processing of lexical stress during visual word recognition: Typicality effects and orthographic correlatesQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59
M. Harm, Mark Seidenberg (2004)
Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.Psychological review, 111 3
M. Farah, James McClelland (1991)
A computational model of semantic memory impairment: modality specificity and emergent category specificity.Journal of experimental psychology. General, 120 4
B. Ans, S. Carbonnel, S. Valdois (1998)
A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading.Psychological review, 105 4
Coltheart Coltheart, Rastle Rastle, Perry Perry, Langdon Langdon, Ziegler Ziegler (2001)
DRC: A computational model of visual word recognition and reading aloudPsychological Review, 108
D. Balota, M. Yap, K. Hutchison, Michael Cortese, Brett Kessler, B. Loftis, J. Neely, D. Nelson, G. Simpson, R. Treiman (2007)
The English Lexicon ProjectBehavior Research Methods, 39
M. Cotelli, J. Abutalebi, M. Zorzi, S. Cappa (2003)
VOWELS IN THE BUFFER: A CASE STUDY OF ACQUIRED DYSGRAPHIA WITH SELECTIVE VOWEL SUBSTITUTIONSCognitive Neuropsychology, 20
Y. Marchand, Connie Adsett, R. Damper (2009)
Automatic Syllabification in English: A Comparison of Different AlgorithmsLanguage and Speech, 52
A. Caramazza, G. Miceli (1990)
The structure of graphemic representationsCognition, 37
Kevin Diependaele, J. Ziegler, J. Grainger (2010)
Fast phonology and the Bimodal Interactive Activation ModelEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22
C. Perry, J. Ziegler, M. Coltheart (2002)
How predictable is spelling? Developing and testing metrics of phoneme-grapheme contingencyQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55
Michael Jordan (1990)
Attractor dynamics and parallelism in a connectionist sequential machine
(1989)
Word recognition and naming : A mega study [ Abstract ] . Paper presented at the Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society
M. Taft (1979)
Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS)Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18
M. Taft (1992)
The body of the BOSS : subsyllabic units in the lexical processing of polysyllabic wordsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18
(2006)
Primary Framework for literacy and mathematics. Available at
R. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, L. Gulikers (1996)
The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM)
Percentage of trisyllabic answers produced and percentage of short vowel responses produced with two-and three-syllable responses. Data S1. Performance of the model on intervocalic consonants
(2002)
How predictable is spelling ? An analysis of soundspelling contingency in English
G. Pagliuca, P. Monaghan (2010)
Discovering large grain sizes in a transparent orthography: Insights from a connectionist model of Italian word namingEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 22
J. Ziegler, Caroline Castel, C. Pech-Georgel, Florence George, F. Alario, C. Perry (2008)
Developmental dyslexia and the dual route model of reading: Simulating individual differences and subtypesCognition, 107
R. Venezky, D. Massaro (1987)
Orthographic structure and spelling-sound regularity in reading English words.
M. Taft (2001)
Processing of Orthographic Structure by Adults of Different Reading AbilityLanguage and Speech, 44
C. Kello
1 Considering the Junction Model of Lexical Processing
S. Pinker, Alan Prince (1988)
On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisitionCognition, 28
S. Lupker, J. Acha, C. Davis, Manuel Perea (2012)
An investigation of the role of grapheme units in word recognition.Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance, 38 6
McClelland McClelland (2009)
The place of modelling in cognitive scienceTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 1
Rhet 1302 (1981)
Cognitive science.Science, 214 4516
It is often assumed that graphemes are a crucial level of orthographic representation above letters. Current connectionist models of reading, however, do not address how the mapping from letters to graphemes is learned. One major challenge for computational modeling is therefore developing a model that learns this mapping and can assign the graphemes to linguistically meaningful categories such as the onset, vowel, and coda of a syllable. Here, we present a model that learns to do this in English for strings of any letter length and any number of syllables. The model is evaluated on error rates and further validated on the results of a behavioral experiment designed to examine ambiguities in the processing of graphemes. The results show that the model (a) chooses graphemes from letter strings with a high level of accuracy, even when trained on only a small portion of the English lexicon; (b) chooses a similar set of graphemes as people do in situations where different graphemes can potentially be selected; (c) predicts orthographic effects on segmentation which are found in human data; and (d) can be readily integrated into a full‐blown model of multi‐syllabic reading aloud such as CDP++ (Perry, Ziegler, & Zorzi, 2010). Altogether, these results suggest that the model provides a plausible hypothesis for the kind of computations that underlie the use of graphemes in skilled reading.
Cognitive Science - A Multidisciplinary Journal – Wiley
Published: Jul 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.