Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Sensitivity and Higher‐Order Knowledge

Sensitivity and Higher‐Order Knowledge Vogel, Sosa, and Huemer have all argued that sensitivity is incompatible with knowing that you do not believe falsely, therefore the sensitivity condition must be false. I show that this objection misses its mark because it fails to take account of the basis of belief. Moreover, if the objection is modified to account for the basis of belief then it collapses into the more familiar objection that sensitivity is incompatible with closure. (But that is an objection which sensitivity theorists are already prepared to meet, one way or another.) http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Pacific Philosophical Quarterly Wiley

Sensitivity and Higher‐Order Knowledge

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly , Volume 99 (2) – Jan 1, 2018

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/sensitivity-and-higher-order-knowledge-VfdwscB50Y

References (21)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
© 2018 The Author. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly © 2018 University of Southern California and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
ISSN
0279-0750
eISSN
1468-0114
DOI
10.1111/papq.12164
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Vogel, Sosa, and Huemer have all argued that sensitivity is incompatible with knowing that you do not believe falsely, therefore the sensitivity condition must be false. I show that this objection misses its mark because it fails to take account of the basis of belief. Moreover, if the objection is modified to account for the basis of belief then it collapses into the more familiar objection that sensitivity is incompatible with closure. (But that is an objection which sensitivity theorists are already prepared to meet, one way or another.)

Journal

Pacific Philosophical QuarterlyWiley

Published: Jan 1, 2018

There are no references for this article.