Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Jakab, Cyrille Norotte, F. Marga, Keith Murphy, G. Vunjak‐Novakovic, G. Forgacs (2010)
Tissue engineering by self-assembly and bio-printing of living cellsBiofabrication, 2
Martin Gruene, C. Unger, L. Koch, A. Deiwick, B. Chichkov (2011)
Dispensing pico to nanolitre of a natural hydrogel by laser-assisted bioprintingBioMedical Engineering OnLine, 10
N. Fedorovich, W. Schuurman, Hans Wijnberg, H. Prins, P. Weeren, J. Malda, J. Malda, J. Alblas, W. Dhert (2012)
Biofabrication of osteochondral tissue equivalents by printing topologically defined, cell-laden hydrogel scaffolds.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 18 1
P. Habibović, U. Gbureck, C. Doillon, D. Bassett, C. Blitterswijk, J. Barralet (2008)
Osteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants.Biomaterials, 29 7
Petra Dijkman, A. Driessen-Mol, C. Bouten, S. Hoerstrup, Fpt Baaijens (2009)
Tissue engineering of heart valves, 5
A. Skardal, Jianxing Zhang, Lindsi McCoard, Xiaoyu Xu, S. Oottamasathien, G. Prestwich (2010)
Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting.Tissue engineering. Part A, 16 8
J. Ballyns, D. Cohen, E. Malone, S. Maher, H. Potter, T. Wright, Hod Lipson, L. Bonassar (2010)
An optical method for evaluation of geometric fidelity for anatomically shaped tissue-engineered constructs.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 16 4
J. Butcher, C. Simmons, J. Warnock (2008)
Mechanobiology of the aortic heart valve.The Journal of heart valve disease, 17 1
J. Taboas, R. Maddox, P. Krebsbach, S. Hollister (2003)
Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer-ceramic scaffolds.Biomaterials, 24 1
Cyrille Norotte, F. Marga, L. Niklason, G. Forgacs (2009)
Scaffold-free vascular tissue engineering using bioprinting.Biomaterials, 30 30
D. Cohen, J. Lipton, L. Bonassar, Hod Lipson (2010)
Additive manufacturing for in situ repair of osteochondral defectsBiofabrication, 2
V. Mironov, T. Trusk, V. Kasyanov, S. Little, R. Swaja, R. Markwald (2009)
Biofabrication: a 21st century manufacturing paradigmBiofabrication, 1
B. Duan, L. Hockaday, K. Kang, J. Butcher (2013)
3D bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A, 101 5
L. Koch, Stefanie Kuhn, H. Sorg, Martin Gruene, S. Schlie, R. Gaebel, Bianca Polchow, K. Reimers, S. Stoelting, N. Ma, P. Vogt, Prof. Steinhoff, B. Chichkov (2010)
Laser printing of skin cells and human stem cells.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 16 5
R. Chang, K. Emami, Honglu Wu, Wei Sun (2010)
Biofabrication of a three-dimensional liver micro-organ as an in vitro drug metabolism modelBiofabrication, 2
Xiaofeng Cui, T. Boland (2009)
Human microvasculature fabrication using thermal inkjet printing technology.Biomaterials, 30 31
Direct Freeform Fabrication of Seeded Hydrogels in Arbitrary Geometries
Wonhye Lee, J. Debasitis, V. Lee, Jong-Hwan Lee, K. Fischer, Karl Edminster, J. Park, S. Yoo (2009)
Multi-layered culture of human skin fibroblasts and keratinocytes through three-dimensional freeform fabrication.Biomaterials, 30 8
Brian Aguado, Widya Mulyasasmita, James Su, K. Lampe, S. Heilshorn (2012)
Improving viability of stem cells during syringe needle flow through the design of hydrogel cell carriers.Tissue engineering. Part A, 18 7-8
E. Malone, Hod Lipson (2007)
Fab@Home: the personal desktop fabricator kitRapid Prototyping Journal, 13
R. Sodian, S. Hoerstrup, J. Sperling, S. Daebritz, David Martin, F. Schoen, J. Vacanti, J. Mayer (2000)
Tissue engineering of heart valves: in vitro experiences.The Annals of thoracic surgery, 70 1
J. Butcher, Andrea Penrod, Andrés García, R. Nerem (2004)
Unique Morphology and Focal Adhesion Development of Valvular Endothelial Cells in Static and Fluid Flow EnvironmentsArteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, 24
D. Cohen, Winifred Lo, Andrew Tsavaris, David Peng, Hod Lipson, L. Bonassar (2011)
Increased mixing improves hydrogel homogeneity and quality of three-dimensional printed constructs.Tissue engineering. Part C, Methods, 17 2
Carlos Chang, E. Boland, Stuart Williams, J. Hoying (2011)
Direct-write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for future regenerative therapies.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials, 98 1
(2011)
Download details:
N. Fedorovich, Hans Wijnberg, W. Dhert, J. Alblas (2011)
Distinct tissue formation by heterogeneous printing of osteo- and endothelial progenitor cells.Tissue engineering. Part A, 17 15-16
J. Butcher, Gretchen Mahler, L. Hockaday (2011)
Aortic valve disease and treatment: the need for naturally engineered solutions.Advanced drug delivery reviews, 63 4-5
R. Chang, J. Nam, Wei Sun (2008)
Effects of dispensing pressure and nozzle diameter on cell survival from solid freeform fabrication-based direct cell writing.Tissue engineering. Part A, 14 1
D. Hutmacher, S. Cool (2007)
Concepts of scaffold-based tissue engineering—the rationale to use solid free-form fabrication techniquesJournal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, 11
Many soft tissues exhibit complex anatomical geometry that is challenging to replicate for regenerative medicine applications. Solid freeform fabrication (SFF) has emerged as an attractive approach for creating 3D tissues, but a detailed understanding of how specific fabrication parameters affect accuracy and viability has not been established to date. In this study, we evaluate the effects of printing parameters of the Fab@Home 3D printing system on accuracy using alginate, photocrosslinkable polyethylene-glycol diacrylate (PEG-DA) and gelatin as commonly used model hydrogel materials. Print accuracy and resolution along the length, width and height were determined based on quantitative image analysis. The effects of extrusion parameters on cell viability were assessed using porcine aortic valve interstitial cells (PAVIC) as a model cell type. We observed that pressure, pathheight and pathspace all significantly affected print accuracy and resolution. Printing conditions did not affect PAVIC viability within the ranges applied. We predicted that optimal pressure, pathheight and pathspace values would be increased linearly with increasing nozzle diameter, and we confirmed that the predicted values generate accurate 3D geometries while poorly chosen parameters yield inaccurate, unpredictable geometries. This systematic optimization strategy therefore improves the accuracy of 3D printing platforms for biofabrication and tissue engineering applications.
Biofabrication – IOP Publishing
Published: Sep 1, 2013
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.