Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The intervention of mechanical tactile stimulation modulates somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and cortical oscillations

The intervention of mechanical tactile stimulation modulates somatosensory evoked magnetic fields... The different cortical activity evoked by a mechanical tactile stimulus depends on tactile stimulus patterns, which demonstrates that simple stimuli (i.e., global synchronous stimulation the stimulus area) activate the primary somatosensory cortex alone, whereas complex stimuli (i.e., stimulation while moving in the stimulus area) activate not only the primary somatosensory cortex but also the primary motor area. Here, we investigated whether the effects of a repetitive mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and cortical oscillations depend on MS patterns. This single‐blinded study included 15 healthy participants. Two types interventions of MS lasting 20 min were used: a repetitive global tactile stimulation (RGS) was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, whereas a sequential stepwise displacement tactile stimulation (SSDS) was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of six pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. Each parameter was measured pre‐ and post‐intervention. The P50m amplitude of the SEF was increased by RGS and decreased by SSDS. The modulation of P50m was correlated with its amplitude before RGS and with the modulation of beta band oscillation at the resting state after SSDS. This study showed that the effects of a 20‐min MS on SEFs and cortical oscillations depend on mechanical tactile stimulus patterns. Moreover, our results offer potential for the modulation of tactile functions and selection of stimulation patterns according to cortical states. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png European Journal of Neuroscience Wiley

The intervention of mechanical tactile stimulation modulates somatosensory evoked magnetic fields and cortical oscillations

Download PDF
14 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/wiley/the-intervention-of-mechanical-tactile-stimulation-modulates-XIbyRy3Pdw

References (65)

Publisher
Wiley
Copyright
Copyright © 2021 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and John Wiley & Sons Ltd
ISSN
0953-816X
eISSN
1460-9568
DOI
10.1111/ejn.15209
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The different cortical activity evoked by a mechanical tactile stimulus depends on tactile stimulus patterns, which demonstrates that simple stimuli (i.e., global synchronous stimulation the stimulus area) activate the primary somatosensory cortex alone, whereas complex stimuli (i.e., stimulation while moving in the stimulus area) activate not only the primary somatosensory cortex but also the primary motor area. Here, we investigated whether the effects of a repetitive mechanical tactile stimulation (MS) on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs) and cortical oscillations depend on MS patterns. This single‐blinded study included 15 healthy participants. Two types interventions of MS lasting 20 min were used: a repetitive global tactile stimulation (RGS) was used to stimulate the finger by using 24 pins installed on a finger pad, whereas a sequential stepwise displacement tactile stimulation (SSDS) was used to stimulate the finger by moving a row of six pins between the left and right sides on the finger pad. Each parameter was measured pre‐ and post‐intervention. The P50m amplitude of the SEF was increased by RGS and decreased by SSDS. The modulation of P50m was correlated with its amplitude before RGS and with the modulation of beta band oscillation at the resting state after SSDS. This study showed that the effects of a 20‐min MS on SEFs and cortical oscillations depend on mechanical tactile stimulus patterns. Moreover, our results offer potential for the modulation of tactile functions and selection of stimulation patterns according to cortical states.

Journal

European Journal of Neuroscience – Wiley

Published: May 1, 2021

Keywords: ; ; ;

There are no references for this article.