Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Philip Stiles (1993)
The future for boards: Self-regulation or legislation?Long Range Planning, 26
Frederick Sturdivant, James Ginter, Alan Sawyer (1985)
Managers' conservatism and corporate performanceSouthern Medical Journal, 6
J. Pearce, S. Zahra (1992)
BOARD COMPOSITION FROM A STRATEGIC CONTINGENCY PERSPECTIVEJournal of Management Studies, 29
Thomas Krayenbuehl (1993)
Corporate governance in banking—A case for tighter regulation?Long Range Planning, 26
Walter Salmon (1993)
Crisis prevention: how to gear up your board.Harvard business review, 71 1
J. Goodstein, Kanak Gautam, W. Boeker (1994)
The effects of board size and diversity on strategic changeSouthern Medical Journal, 15
B. Tuckman (1965)
DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS.Psychological bulletin, 63
Sturdivant Sturdivant, Ginter Ginter, Sawyer Sawyer (1985)
Managers’ conservatism and corporate performanceStrategic Management Journal, 6
Watson Watson, Kumar Kumar, Michaelsen Michaelsen (1993)
Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groupsAcademy of Management Journal, 36
M. Wiersema, Karen Bantel (1992)
Top Management Team Demography and Corporate Strategic ChangeAcademy of Management Journal, 35
Rita Kosnik (1990)
Effects of Board Demography and Directors' Incentives on Corporate Greenmail DecisionsAcademy of Management Journal, 33
S. Zahra, J. Pearce (1989)
Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative ModelJournal of Management, 15
I. Kesner, Roy Johnson (1990)
An investigation of the relationship between board composition and stockholder suitsSouthern Medical Journal, 11
S. Finkelstein, D. Hambrick (1990)
Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35
Singh Singh, Harianto Harianto (1989)
Top management tenure, corporate ownership structure and the magnitude of golden parachutesStrategic Management Journal, 10
C. O'Reilly, D. Caldwell, W. Barnett (1989)
Work group demography, social integration, and turnover.Administrative Science Quarterly, 34
Harbir Singh, F. Harianto (1989)
Top management tenure, corporate ownership structure and the magnitude of golden parachutesSouthern Medical Journal, 10
William Judge, Carl Zeithaml (1992)
Institutional and Strategic Choice Perspectives on Board Involvement in the Strategic Decision Process
J. Harrison (1987)
The Strategic Use of Corporate Board CommitteesCalifornia Management Review, 30
B. Baysinger, R. Hoskisson (1990)
The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control: Effects on Corporate StrategyAcademy of Management Review, 15
J. Pfeffer (1972)
Size and Composition of Corporate Boards of Directors: The Organization and its EnvironmentAdministrative Science Quarterly, 17
T. Lant, Frances Milliken, B. Batra (1992)
The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical explorationStrategic Management Journal, 13
B. Oviatt (1988)
Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship: Incentives for Congruent InterestsAcademy of Management Review, 13
Hill Hill (1994)
Sind grosse Verwaltungsräte ef‐fizientNeue Zärcher Zeitung
Philip Stiles, B. Taylor (1993)
Benchmarking corporate governance: The impact of the Cadbury CodeLong Range Planning, 26
Goodstein Goodstein, Gautam Gautam, Boeker Boeker (1994)
The effects of board size and diversity on strategic changeStrategic Management Journal, 15
Kesner Kesner, Johnson Johnson (1990)
An investigation of the relationship between board composition and stockholder suitsStrategic Management Journal, 11
Warren Watson, Kamalesh Kumar, L. Michaelsen (1993)
Cultural diversity''s impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diver
Patton Patton, Baker Baker (1987)
Why won't directors rock the boatHarvard Business Review, 65
This article examines the structure of boards and its effects on the performance of significant board functions. Composition of boards is measured by size, outside director representation and cognitive, as well as demographic diversity. A firm's environment, strategy, structure and culture, and factors attributed to personal characteristics of board members were viewed as important determinants affecting effectiveness of boards. Most important, decisions on board size and composition involve a trade‐off between benefits of diversity and enhanced costs of group development and group decision processes.
Corporate Governance – Wiley
Published: Oct 1, 1995
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.