Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Peters, D. Stone (1988)
Policy Paradox and Political ReasonAmerican Political Science Review, 83
M. Edelman (1967)
The symbolic uses of politics
D. Weimer, A. Vining (1989)
Policy analysis : concepts and practice
James McGann (1994)
The Competition for Dollars, Scholars and Influence in the Public Policy Research Industry
Patricia Ingraham (1987)
TOWARD MORE SYSTEMATIC CONSIDERATION OF POLICY DESIGN1Policy Studies Journal, 15
John Kingdon (1984)
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
C. Weiss (1991)
Organizations for Policy Analysis: Helping Government Think
R. Nelson (1989)
The office of policy analysis in the department of the interiorJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8
L. Pugliaresi, Diane Berliner (1989)
Policy analysis at the department of state: The policy planning staffJournal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8
Gaaddis Smith, J. Smith (1990)
The Idea Brokers: Think Tanks and the Rise of the New Policy EliteForeign Affairs, 70
L. Lynn (1989)
Policy analysis in the bureaucracy: How new? how effective?Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 8
H. Aaron (1989)
Politics and the Professors RevisitedThe American Economic Review, 79
A. Wildavsky (1979)
Speaking Truth to Power: The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis
M. Holden (1996)
Continuity and Disruption: Essays in Public Administration
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 16, No. 2, 204â218 (1997) © 1997 by the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. CCC 0276-8739/97/020204-15 APPAM Presidential Address / 205 over the microphone willinglyâto the intellectual patent medicine salesmenââ [Rivlin, 1984, p. 18]. We are all aware of recent frustrations experienced by policy analysts who have not been able to convince contemporary decisionmakers of the wisdom of their recommendations. These frustrations provoke a series of questions. What does happen on the other side of the conversation? Have we created a mirror in which the known speaker projects his or her own image to the other side? Has the one-sided conversation actually turned into a monologue? Have we focused only on the production side of the conversation and not on the consumption side? Have the participants in the conversation failed to speak the same language and have instead engaged in what the child psychologists call parallel play? Do the participants on the other side of the conversation move in and out of the conversation? Does their conversation change over time? Today I want to examine the nature of the conversation between the
Journal of Policy Analysis and Management – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 1997
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.