L. Pescatello, R. Arena, D. Riebe, P. Thompson (1995)
ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription
N. Miller, S. Strath, A. Swartz, Susan Cashin (2010)
Estimating absolute and relative physical activity intensity across age via accelerometry in adults.Journal of aging and physical activity, 18 2
Y. Zhang, Karel Beenakker, P. Butala, Cheng-Cheih Lin, T. Little, A. Maier, M. Stijntjes, R. Vartanian, R. Wagenaar (2012)
Monitoring walking and cycling of middle-aged to older community dwellers using wireless wearable accelerometers2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
Michael Stec, E. Rawson (2012)
Estimation of Resistance Exercise Energy Expenditure Using Triaxial AccelerometryJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 26
S. Tripathi, Y Kumar, A. Prabhakar, S. Joshi, A. Agrawal (2015)
Passive blood plasma separation at the microscale: a review of design principles and microdevicesJournal of Micromechanics and Microengineering, 25
Sarah Powell, A. Rowlands (2004)
Intermonitor variability of the RT3 accelerometer during typical physical activities.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 36 2
Whitney Welch, D. Bassett, Dixie Thompson, P. Freedson, J. Staudenmayer, D. John, J. Steeves, S. Conger, T. Ceaser, C. Howe, J. Sasaki, E. Fitzhugh (2013)
Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 45 10
P. Freedson, E. Melanson, J. Sirard (1998)
Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 30 5
D. Hendelman, K. Miller, C. Baggett, E. Debold, P. Freedson (2000)
Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 32 9 Suppl
J. Sasaki, D. John, P. Freedson (2011)
Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors.Journal of science and medicine in sport, 14 5
A. Santos-Lozano, G. Torres-Luque, Pedro Marín, Jonatan Ruiz, Jonatan Ruiz, Alejandro Lucia, N. Garatachea (2012)
Intermonitor Variability of GT3X AccelerometerInternational Journal of Sports Medicine, 33
M. Brandes, V. Hees, Viviane Hannöver, S. Brage (2012)
Estimating energy expenditure from raw accelerometry in three types of locomotion.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 44 11
V. Lopes, P. Magalhães, J. Bragada, C. Vasques (2009)
Actigraph calibration in obese/overweight and type 2 diabetes mellitus middle-aged to old adult patients.Journal of physical activity & health, 6 Suppl 1
C. Howe, J. Staudenmayer, P. Freedson (2009)
Accelerometer prediction of energy expenditure: vector magnitude versus vertical axis.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 41 12
A. Santos-Lozano, P. Marín, G. Torres-Luque, J. Ruiz, A. Lucia, N. Garatachea (2012)
Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer.Medical engineering & physics, 34 6
A. Mannini, S. Intille, M. Rosenberger, A. Sabatini, W. Haskell (2013)
Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 45 11
S. Brage, N. Wedderkopp, P. Franks, L. Andersen, K. Froberg (2003)
Reexamination of validity and reliability of the CSA monitor in walking and running.Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 35 8
The triaxial GT3X+ accelerometer can measure activity counts in the vertical, horizontal right to left, horizontal front to back planes, and can generate a summative score of the three axes represented by vector magnitude (VM). Information on the reliability of the GT3X+ at the hip, wrist and ankle sites, over all axes and VM during activities of daily living (ADL) is lacking in the literature. Forty healthy adults (14 men and 26 women) were randomly assigned to perform 10 of 20 ADL (consisting of sedentary, housework, yard work, locomotive and recreational activities) while wearing two monitors on the hip, wrist and ankle. Subjects performed each ADL over 7 min and the mean activity counts during the last 4 min were used for analyses. Average intraclass correlations between monitors were high for the three sites for each axis and VM (hip: 0.943, 0.857, 0.864 and 0.966, respectively; wrist: 0.994, 0.963, 0.961 and 0.989, respectively; ankle: 0.977, 0.979, 0.927 and 0.986, respectively). These data suggest that GT3X+ accelerometers measurements made from the hip, wrist and ankle sites are reliable during ADL across all axes and VM.
Physiological Measurement – IOP Publishing
Published: Feb 1, 2014
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.