Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Reply to Putnam's Commentary on Promise of, Problems with, and Potential Refinement of the “Extremely Short Form of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire”

Reply to Putnam's Commentary on Promise of, Problems with, and Potential Refinement of the... Psychological Reports: Measures & Statistics 2012, 111, 2, 621-623. © Psychological Reports 2012 rePly to PUtNaM’s coMMeNtary oN ProMise oF , ProBleMs With, aND PoteNtial reFiNeMeNt oF the “eXtreMely short 1, 2 ForM oF the chilDreN’s Beha Vior QUestioNNaire” ester F. c. sleDDeNs Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands sheryl o. hUghes, teresia M. o’coNNor, alicia BeltraN, JaNice c. BaraNoWsKi, theresa a. NicKlas, aND toM BaraNoWsKi Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Houston, Texas We appreciate s. P. Putnam’s (2012) gentle commentary on our orig- inal article (sleddens, hughes, o’connor, Beltran, Baranowski, Nicklas, et al., 2012). in our article, we evaluated the psychometrics of the 36-item children’s Behavior Questionnaire (cBQ), including item response mod - eling analyses, and introduced a single-item temperament scale for use in applied work. this scale is based on the three broad temperamental traits of Surgency/Extraversion, Negative Affectivity, and Effortful Con- trol measured by several validated forms of the cBQ (i.e., the standard 195-item form, the short 94-item form, and the very short 36-item form; rothbart, ahadi, hershey, & Fisher, 2001; Putnam & rothbart, 2006). the single-item http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Psychological Reports SAGE

Reply to Putnam's Commentary on Promise of, Problems with, and Potential Refinement of the “Extremely Short Form of the Children's Behavior Questionnaire”

Download PDF
3 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/sage/reply-to-putnam-s-commentary-on-promise-of-problems-with-and-potential-ZmXXr5JTYe

References (10)

Publisher
SAGE
Copyright
© 2012 SAGE Publications
ISSN
0033-2941
eISSN
1558-691X
DOI
10.2466/08.10.21.pr0.111.5.621-623
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Psychological Reports: Measures & Statistics 2012, 111, 2, 621-623. © Psychological Reports 2012 rePly to PUtNaM’s coMMeNtary oN ProMise oF , ProBleMs With, aND PoteNtial reFiNeMeNt oF the “eXtreMely short 1, 2 ForM oF the chilDreN’s Beha Vior QUestioNNaire” ester F. c. sleDDeNs Department of Health Promotion, NUTRIM School for Nutrition, Toxicology and Metabolism Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands sheryl o. hUghes, teresia M. o’coNNor, alicia BeltraN, JaNice c. BaraNoWsKi, theresa a. NicKlas, aND toM BaraNoWsKi Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine USDA/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Houston, Texas We appreciate s. P. Putnam’s (2012) gentle commentary on our orig- inal article (sleddens, hughes, o’connor, Beltran, Baranowski, Nicklas, et al., 2012). in our article, we evaluated the psychometrics of the 36-item children’s Behavior Questionnaire (cBQ), including item response mod - eling analyses, and introduced a single-item temperament scale for use in applied work. this scale is based on the three broad temperamental traits of Surgency/Extraversion, Negative Affectivity, and Effortful Con- trol measured by several validated forms of the cBQ (i.e., the standard 195-item form, the short 94-item form, and the very short 36-item form; rothbart, ahadi, hershey, & Fisher, 2001; Putnam & rothbart, 2006). the single-item

Journal

Psychological Reports – SAGE

Published: Oct 1, 2012

There are no references for this article.