Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 7-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping

Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests... <jats:p>In comparison with the Neotropical big cats, jaguar (<jats:italic>Panthera onca</jats:italic> L.) and puma (<jats:italic>Felis concolor</jats:italic> L.), medium and small felids are poorly studied. Furthermore, studying wild felids in forest habitats is extremely difficult using direct methods given that most species are principally nocturnal and secretive (Gittleman 1996). Indirect methods are therefore particularly important, e.g. radio-telemetry (Emmons 1987, 1988; Konecny 1989, Ludlow &amp; Sunquist 1987) or camera trapping (Maffei <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. 2002, Trolle &amp; Kéry 2003). Using systematic camera trap surveys, we compare the population density of ocelots (<jats:italic>Felis pardalis</jats:italic> L.) across five Bolivian dry-forest sites with different habitat types and/or annual rainfall regimes (Table 1). We hypothesize that ocelot densities will decline as rainfall declines. In addition, we estimate the population of ocelots in the 34 400-km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco National Park. Finally, we describe and evaluate additional ecological information provided by camera trapping: activity patterns relative to seasonality and moon phase, sex ratios, ranging patterns and relative abundance compared with sympatric felids.</jats:p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Tropical Ecology CrossRef

Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping

Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 21 (3): 349-353 – May 1, 2005

Ocelot (Felis pardalis) population densities, activity, and ranging behaviour in the dry forests of eastern Bolivia: data from camera trapping


Abstract

<jats:p>In comparison with the Neotropical big cats, jaguar (<jats:italic>Panthera onca</jats:italic> L.) and puma (<jats:italic>Felis concolor</jats:italic> L.), medium and small felids are poorly studied. Furthermore, studying wild felids in forest habitats is extremely difficult using direct methods given that most species are principally nocturnal and secretive (Gittleman 1996). Indirect methods are therefore particularly important, e.g. radio-telemetry (Emmons 1987, 1988; Konecny 1989, Ludlow &amp; Sunquist 1987) or camera trapping (Maffei <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. 2002, Trolle &amp; Kéry 2003). Using systematic camera trap surveys, we compare the population density of ocelots (<jats:italic>Felis pardalis</jats:italic> L.) across five Bolivian dry-forest sites with different habitat types and/or annual rainfall regimes (Table 1). We hypothesize that ocelot densities will decline as rainfall declines. In addition, we estimate the population of ocelots in the 34 400-km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco National Park. Finally, we describe and evaluate additional ecological information provided by camera trapping: activity patterns relative to seasonality and moon phase, sex ratios, ranging patterns and relative abundance compared with sympatric felids.</jats:p>

Loading next page...
 
/lp/crossref/ocelot-felis-pardalis-population-densities-activity-and-ranging-a0ZzrFncNk

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
CrossRef
ISSN
0266-4674
DOI
10.1017/s0266467405002397
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

<jats:p>In comparison with the Neotropical big cats, jaguar (<jats:italic>Panthera onca</jats:italic> L.) and puma (<jats:italic>Felis concolor</jats:italic> L.), medium and small felids are poorly studied. Furthermore, studying wild felids in forest habitats is extremely difficult using direct methods given that most species are principally nocturnal and secretive (Gittleman 1996). Indirect methods are therefore particularly important, e.g. radio-telemetry (Emmons 1987, 1988; Konecny 1989, Ludlow &amp; Sunquist 1987) or camera trapping (Maffei <jats:italic>et al</jats:italic>. 2002, Trolle &amp; Kéry 2003). Using systematic camera trap surveys, we compare the population density of ocelots (<jats:italic>Felis pardalis</jats:italic> L.) across five Bolivian dry-forest sites with different habitat types and/or annual rainfall regimes (Table 1). We hypothesize that ocelot densities will decline as rainfall declines. In addition, we estimate the population of ocelots in the 34 400-km<jats:sup>2</jats:sup> Kaa-Iya del Gran Chaco National Park. Finally, we describe and evaluate additional ecological information provided by camera trapping: activity patterns relative to seasonality and moon phase, sex ratios, ranging patterns and relative abundance compared with sympatric felids.</jats:p>

Journal

Journal of Tropical EcologyCrossRef

Published: May 1, 2005

There are no references for this article.