Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
(1996)
Areal Distribution and Concentrations of Contaminants of Concern Surficial Streambed and Lakebed Sediments
T. Reynoldson, K. Day, T. Pascoe, J. Wright, D. Sutcliffe, M. Furse (2000)
The development of the BEAST: a predictive approach for assessing sediment quality in the North American Great Lakes.
(1986)
Sediment quality criteria methodology validation: Calculation of screening level concentrations from field data
(1998)
Biological Guidelines for the Assessment of Sediment Quality in the Laurentian Great Lakes
C. Marvin, M. Charlton, E. Reiner, T. Kolic, K. Macpherson, G. Stern, Eric Braekevelt, J. Estenik, Lina Thiessen, S. Painter (2002)
Surficial Sediment Contamination in Lakes Erie and Ontario: A Comparative AnalysisJournal of Great Lakes Research, 28
G. Krantzberg, J. Hartig, M. Zarull (2000)
Sediment management deciding when to interveneEnvironmental Science & Technology, 34
T. Reynoldson, R. Bailey, K. Day, R. Norris (1995)
Biological guidelines for freshwater sediment based on BEnthic Assessment of SedimenT (the BEAST) using a multivariate approach for predicting biological stateAustral Ecology, 20
B. Neary, H. Khan, K. Saffran, Dw Williamson (2001)
Canadian Water Quality Guidelines for the Protection of Aquatic Life CCME WATER QUALITY INDEX 1.0 Technical Report
K. Clarke, R. Green (1988)
Statistical Design And Analysis For A Biological Effects StudyMarine Ecology Progress Series, 46
(1997)
The Remedial Action Plan Update. Progress on the RAP Program : Rehabilitating and Protecting the Great Lakes Ecosystem. Ontario Ministry of Environment Great Lakes Programs Office
P. Chapman (1996)
Presentation and interpretation of Sediment Quality Triad dataEcotoxicology, 5
D. Macdonald, C. Ingersoll, T. Berger (2000)
Development and Evaluation of Consensus-Based Sediment Quality Guidelines for Freshwater EcosystemsArchives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 39
S. Smith, D. Macdonald, K. Keenleyside, C. Ingersoll, L. Field (1996)
A Preliminary Evaluation of Sediment Quality Assessment Values for Freshwater EcosystemsJournal of Great Lakes Research, 22
D. Persaud, R. Jaagumagi, A. Hayton (1993)
Guidelines for the protection and management of aquatic sediment quality in Ontario
U. Borgmann, W. Norwood, T. Reynoldson, F. Rosa (2001)
Identifying cause in sediment assessments: Bioavailability and the Sediment Quality TriadCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58
(1987)
Technical Resource Document for Variances from the Secondary Containment Requirement of Hazardous Waste Tank Systems
G. Burton, P. Chapman, E. Smith (2002)
Weight-of-Evidence Approaches for Assessing Ecosystem ImpairmentHuman and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 8
Sediment Quality Index for Contaminant Assessment
A sediment quality index (SQI) based on the Canadian Water Quality Index was developed and applied to the assessment of sediment quality in two Great Lakes Areas Of Concern where metals are the primary contaminants of potential concern, Peninsula Harbour (Lake Superior) and Collingwood Harbour (Lake Huron). The SQI was calculated according to an equation incorporating two elements; scope—the number of variables that do not meet guideline objectives; and, amplitude—the magnitude by which variables exceed guideline objectives. Categorizations of sediment quality were developed based on SQI scores. The robustness of the SQI was evaluated through comparison of the relative rankings of sediment quality in the two test areas with results obtained from principle components analysis (PCA) incorporating reference sites, and calculations of hazard quotients (HQs). Trends and rankings in sediment quality determined by the SQI were similar to those calculated using PCA at both test areas. The HQs also appeared to be good indicators of sediment quality. Both the SQI and HQ methods are based on existing Sediment Quality Guidelines, but the SQI had the added benefit of allowing straightforward integration of multiple contaminants. The SQI and PCA analyses appeared complementary in that the SQI incorporated information on the number of variables exceeding guideline values and the degree to which these guidelines were exceeded. The PCA allowed a simple check of the SQI by relating test conditions to regional background. It is recommended that this analysis be performed concurrently with SQI to ensure that non-anthropogenic sources of contaminants (metals in this case) are not considered as representing an anthropogenic hazard.
Human & Ecological Risk Assessment – Taylor & Francis
Published: Oct 1, 2002
Keywords: sediment quality index; sediment assessment; weight-of-evidence; Great Lakes.
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.